Tagged: Lok Sabha RSS

  • Gaurav Mishra 1:33 pm on May 21, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Lok Sabha, , ,   

    My Post Mentioned in America.gov Roundup of Reactions to the 2009 Indian Election Results 

    Welcome to Gauravonomics Blog! Subscribe to my feed now and you'll never miss a single post!

    My Global Voices post (original here) was mentioned in an America.gov roundup of reactions to the 2009 Indian election results.

    Here is the full text of the article –

    2009 Indian Elections: The Blogosphere Reacts

    — By Tanya Brothen, 20 May 2009

    With national elections in the world’s most populous democracy, India, coming to an end earlier than had been predicted, the blogosphere is buzzing with analysis of the results.

    Gaurav Mishra at Global Voices lists election reactions and observations that Indian voters posted on Twitter.

    Kanishk Tharoor at OpenIndia talks about how the Indian media failed to correctly predict the election results.

    Dr. Karan Thakur at India Times draws parallels between the 2009 Indian elections and the 2008 American elections.

    What are your thoughts on the 2009 Indian elections?

     
    • Tanya 1:40 pm on May 21, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Hi Gaurav,

      Thanks for featuring my post on your blog!

      Tanya

  • Gaurav Mishra 3:52 am on May 16, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Fourth Front, , , , Lok Sabha, , National Democratic Alliance, , , , , , , Third Front, , United Progressive Alliance,   

    India Votes for No Change: Indian Bloggers & Twitter Users React to #IndiaVotes09 Election Results 

    Introduction: India Votes for No Change in the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections

    India votes for the incumbent Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA)

    Photo courtesy Al Jazeera under a Creative Commons License

    The results for the month long Indian Lok Sabha elections are out and India has voted back the incumbent Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) into power with a decisive verdict, surprising many observers.

    As I write this post, the results for 480 out of all the 543 seats have been declared. The Congress is leading in more than 200 has won 206 seats and UPA is less than 20 11 seats away from reaching the magic figure of 273.

    2009 Indian Lok Sabha Elections IndiaVotes09 Results

    The verdict is a reminder of the Indian electorate’s love affair with the Nehru-Gandhi family and a coming of age of sorts for Rahul Gandhi, the young scion of the family. A jubilant Sonia Gandhi reiterated that Manmohan Singh will be Congress Party’s choice for the prime minister. Manmohan Singh will be the first Prime Minister after Jawaharlal Nehru to return to power after a full five-year term.

    The verdict has also led to some serious soul-searching within BJP. It seems that Lal Krishna Advani’s political career is all but over. It will be interesting to see if BJP moves away from its Hindutva roots and repositions itself as a Right of Center party or becomes even more hardcore Hindu Right under the leadership of someone like Narendra Modi.

    Some of the biggest upsets so far: Ram Vilas Paswan, Ram Naik, Renuka Choudhry, Vinod Khanna, Meera Sanyal and Captain Gopnath lost the election while Shashi Tharoor won by a record margin.

    Summary of Reactions from Indian Bloggers and Twitter Users

    The Congress supporters are jubilant, and the BJP die-hards are understandably glum, but most neutral Indian bloggers and Twitter users are happy with the verdict, for more reason than one.

    The two national parties — Congress and BJP — have increased their tally by 40-50 seats. Both Congress and BJP have a more-or-less similar forward-looking national agenda (apart from BJP’s obsession with Hindutva), unlike the regional parties who are focused on caste, language and state affiliations. The consolidation of the national vote is a sigh of relief for the urban Indian “elite”, who were worried about the increasing fragmentation in Indian politics.

    The UPA is 15-20 seats short of the 273 seats it needs to form the government. This precludes the possibility of the opportunistic horse-trading many observers were expecting in the aftermath of the elections. The (almost) clear verdict for UPA is likely to result in a stable government that lasts for five years and isn’t held hostage by the narrow agendas of the regional coalition partners.

    The decisive Congress victory has also surprised most observers. Most predictions and opinion polls had predicted an indecisive verdict with a close finish between BJP and Congress and a rise in the power of the regional parties.

    Some observers will see the verdict as a validation of the tried-and-tested methods of political campaigning in India. The BJP ran an aggressive 360 degree campaign on mass media and digital media, but it didn’t work, like its 2004 India Shining campaign. The Congress ran a traditional campaign, focused on movie songs, local rallies and the charisma of the Nehru-Gandhi family, and succeeded. I would caution you against reading too much into this coincidence and mistaking it for causality. It’s not BJP’s campaign, but BJP’s Hindutva ideology, that has failed the party. BJP has lost in spite of its brilliant campaign, not because of it.

    #IndiaVotes09: Reactions from Indian Twitter Users

    Twitter conversations related to the Indian elections fell into a few distinct categories, including retweets of news reports on the elections results, exuberance over the Congress win, some soul-searching over BJP’s loss (from a very strong BJP support base on Twitter), and opinions on what the election results mean for India.

    Apart from the themes I have talked about above, the #indiavotes09 hastag on Twitter had its own unique memes.

    The first such meme was predictably self referential. After a handful of tweets on the #indiavotes09 hastag throughout the month long elections, the Indian Twitter community spent the day obsessing about election results, making #indiavotes the number one trending topic on Twitter. This led to the usual recurcive navel gazing about how an India-related hashtag is trending on Twitter and Economic Times even did a story on it.

    @Hiway: Indian Twitter community too big and united to be ignored: #indiavotes09 is trending. (we’ve made many topics ‘trend’ recently)

    (Aside from the Economic Times story: As per ViziSense, which analyses web visitor statistics, there are about 533,000 India-based users of Twitter. Tweeple.in follows 31,000 Twitter users in India.)

    Dina just pointed to an interesting graphic on the irrelevance of trending topics on Twitter, which should dampen the exuberance over #indiavotes09 trending on Twitter.

    The second #indiavotes09 meme was about the failure of BJP’s aggressive digital campaign.

    @MaheshMurthy, the CEO and founder of digital agency Pinstorm, offered some interesting analysis on why the BJP campaign didn’t work –

    @MaheshMurthy: #indiavotes09 Don’t think BJP campaign was brilliant. Strategy to project LKA as a strong leader was clearly wrong.

    @MaheshMurthy: #indiavotes09 I dont think most of us thought we had weak leadership, or even if we did, that it was a big problem.

    @MaheshMurthy: #indiavotes09 BJP would have had a better chance if it focused on the difference they would make that was relevant to us.

    @MaheshMurthy: #indiavotes09 BJP campaign used the right medium: social/digital – but offered no relevant message. They were tuned out.

    @MaheshMurthy: #indiavotes09 Googler to me: Advani using them as he wants to connect with young. For that you need medium AND message.

    Other Twitter users also had interesting comments on BJP’s campaign –

    @Dina: I don’t buy that BJP tactics were brilliant. To add to @maheshmurthy ’s response, there were no conversations. It was classic push advertising.

    @NikhilNarayanan: The Bloggers for BJP has just 120 bloggers as per lkadvani.in (count taken 2 days back). 120 is a very small number.

    @Danishk: The issue with BJP campaign as I see it was they forgot that most people looking at those ads are learned people unlike masses.

    @Amit3D: 30 million people access internet daily in India. Approx 10 mil voted and saw BJP’s digimedia campaign. Don’t think that was enough.

    @Amit3D: So I guess BJPs digimedia campaign was big #FAIL. india is not US in numbers when it comes to internet.

    @Sanjukta: Exactly what I just said. No body likes spamming. All those over the top in your face campaign backfired.

    @mohyt: BJP poll results make me wonder if they’d lost by bigger margin had they not done their huge Social Media Marketing campaign #indiavotes09

    @GasperDesouza: Advani tried an ‘Obama’ in India, online campaign, et al. Now his head is on the BJP chopping block #indiavotes09

    @b50: wishes the BJP well. They fought a hard, aggressive campaign. Best of luck for 2014. Be an Opposition we can be proud of. #IndiaVotes09

    @mudittuli: BJP campaign managers are always disconnected with reality, they tried to do a Obama but got slapped in the face #indiavotes09

    @NairArun: BJP’s online campaign was desperate and tacky. The intent was to replicate Obama’s success, but the execution was poor. #indiavotes09

    @DeadPresident: Advani honours BJP youth campaign team http://bit.ly/gmuWI - congrats folks! @bjp_ and @missionbjp and the people behind those

    I tried to argue on behalf of BJP’s strategist Sudheendra Kulkarni, but I’m clearly in a minority today –

    @Gauravonomics: BJP has lost in spite of its brilliant campaign, not because of it. #indiavotes09

    @Gauravonomics: I agree that the BJP/ LKA strategy backfired. I meant that the campaign was brilliant at a tactical level. #indiavotes09

    @Gauravonomics: The BJP campaign did have grassroots online support. Friends of BJP. Bloggers for Advani. Too many BJP supporters on #indiavotes09

    @Gauravonomics: The fact that it didn’t work (due to message etc.) doesn’t mean that BJP’s (digital) campaign was flawed #indiavotes09

    @Gauravonomics: In fact, I feel a little sad for Sudheendra Kulkarni. Given what he had to work with, he did a really good job. #indiavotes09

    The other big meme on Twitter today was writer and Congress candidate Shashi Tharoor live-tweeting the election results –

    @ShashiTharoor: I have won with a majority greater than any Congress candidate in Tvm in 30 years… Truly humbling. Now the real work begins.

    @navinpai: Wow….just found out @ShashiTharoor tweets!! I wonder if he does it or gets a crack team of writers to pen down 140 characters!!

    @ArunRam: @ShashiTharoor Congrats! Hope the Congress party gives you a key cabinet post. India needs more professionals like you in politics.

    @SheetalDube: I am wondering if the Indian cabinet might witness the highest % increase in literacy level with the inclusion of @ShashiTharoor.

    @manishd: @shashitharoor, I think you would be the first MP to be on twitter. Great way to keep in touch with the electorate. We need more like you.

    @SepiaMutiny: Congratulate Shashi Tharoor directly: @shashitharoor (see his live tweets as the results came in!) #IndiaVotes09 (via @sajahq)

    @viveksingh: Looks like @ShashiTharoor is the most popular politician amongst the twitteratti #indiavotes09

    @GauravKanoongo: How many Indian politicians are here on Twitter? I know about only @shashitharoor #indiavotes09

    @acmhatre: @ShashiTharoor in all honesty, I didn’t think you would win but congratulations. No the real test begins.

    So, the top May 16 memes on #indiavotes09 were: 1. #indiavotes09 trending on Twitter, 2. BJP’s aggressive digital campaign failing, and 3. @ShashiTharoor live-tweeting the election results. What else did I miss?

    #IndiaVotes09: Reactions from Indian Bloggers and Analysts

    The same themes have also been dominant in the Indian blogosphere and mainstream media reactions to the election results.

    Rajiv Dingra at WATBlog and Ashish Sinha at Pluggd.in wonder if BJP’s “flawed” campaign strategy was responsible for its defeat. Bhatnaturally argues that BJP’s campaign was too negative. Nirupama Hegde at The Hindu thinks that civic engagement amongst the youth needs to go beyond voting. Ananth Krishnan at The Hindu believes that the internet has failed to get the vote out, but will still be useful to build an online public sphere for political discourse. Business Standard has a great analysis of the election campaigns of various political parties.

    Veteran film director and independent candidate Prakash Jha reflects on his loss in Champaran.

    Industrialist and independent member of parliament Rajeev Chandrashekhar compares his election predictions with the results and finds that, like most other pundits, he was way off the mark. The Overlord points out that both the Indian online community and the poll pundits were wrong in their election predictions.

    BJP supporter Yossarin Offstumped says that the Indian electorate has voted for stability but chosen the wrong national party. Atanu Dey believes that the election results are a setback for India’s development. BJP supporter Brajesh Mishra says that, instead of grieving, BJP should introspect and start preparing for the next elections. Friends of BJP co-founder Rajesh Jain says that BJP needs to decide if it wants to be Right of Center or the Hindu Right. Sush Jaitley analyzes what went wrong with BJP and says that BJP needs to apologize to the country. Jai Mrug at DNA says that BJP is back where it was a decade ago. B Raman at Rediff does a good roundup of the post-election conversations on pro-BJP websites.

    Mehul Srivastava at BusinessWeek does an analysis on what the results mean for Indian politics.  Zoya Hasan at DNA says that the verdict is a reaffirmation of the Indian electorate’s faith in the Nehru-Gandhi family. Sidharth Bhatia at DNA believes that the vote for Congress is a vote for an inclusive India. An Indian Muslim says that the results are a verdict against divisive politics. Harini Calamur believes that the vote for Congress is a verdict against negativity. Dina Mehta thinks that the Mumbai terrorist attack did not affect the elections because people do not want more fear and hatred and negativity being imposed on us by our politicians. In another post, Dina argues that Indian voters have voted for good governance and progress rather than good politicians. S. Mitra Kalita at WSJ calls the verdict a victory for the global Indian. Vir Sanghvi at HT says that Rahul Gandhi has emerged as the most astute strategist of all. Rajesh Jain at WSJ also writes an open letter to the new UPA government.

    The BBC India team did a great live coverage of the election results, so did the NDTV team, Indipepal, Sundeep Dougal at Outlook and a group of Indian political bloggers, including Offstumped.

    I’ll be updating this post with reactions to the Lok Sabha results from Indian bloggers and Twitter users. Please leave tips to interesting posts and your own reactions in the comments section.

    Cross-posted at Global Voices.

     
    • Dina Mehta 3:56 am on May 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      heh – check this out Gaurav – @ross just tweeted the link – http://www.flickr.com/photos/meg/3533025291/ – with the comment – “Twitter trending topics and the hump of irrelevance”

    • Dina Mehta 3:56 am on May 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Gaurav … one more quick thought – the title of your post seems to suggest that the country voted for no change (I know you meant it in a different way – UPA back). I do feel the voter has voted actively for change actually – for many of the reasons you have mentioned in your post, one of the largest being wanting a stable strong govt rather than an adhoc mix of parties and a fragmented house.

      Just sharing :)

      • Gaurav Mishra 4:47 am on May 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        @Dina: Yes, I meant “no change” as in status quo, but you are right in that the status quo itself is of a different nature.

    • Sameer 3:56 am on May 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      I agree with Dina. Your post is great but the title is a little misleading.

    • Maneesh 4:40 am on May 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Excellent round up Gaurav..

      I completely agree with you on the BJP and it’s digital marketing view that you shared here. The idea was right, but the improper execution and the lack of a strong message and a bent of mind that using the web itself would bring youth to one’s fold was the premise of it not pushing BJP up the poll ladder. In fact many had considered their campaign an effect of Obama using the web,a nd dubbed it the Obama way of marketing which I strongly disagree with.. and even blogged about at WATBlog (Linked that post to my name here).

      Congress has to thank BJP’s confusion and obsession with Hindutva, the Left’s clear lack of foresight, and to a very small extent Raj Thakeray’s MNS for its victory that went a long way beyond Singh’s credo and Rahul and Sonia’s charm. For that reason I also believe the result shouldn’t be dubbed as the continuing love affair of our countrymen and the Gandhi family.

      Shashi Tharoor being on Twitter doesn’t quite cut for me because he just follows his son and the Mutiny mag guy (at least till the last time I saw).

      Once again, a very good post..

      • Gaurav Mishra 4:50 am on May 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        @Manish: I just wrote a longish piece on the BJP campaign. Will post it soon.

        I do believe that the Gandhi family has consolidated its hold on Indian politics in these elections.

        Yes, Shashi Tharoor only follows two people on Twitter, but he does answer some @reply messages.

    • R R Dasgupta 11:49 am on May 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      I don’t quite agree with Zoya Hassan’s observation on people’s Love for Nehru-Gandhi lineage. It was a collective voice of people for stability as against a mixed bag of on-and-off alliances, total revolt & apathy on being repeatedly divided on communal lines,rewarding the good work on NPT, for demonstrating resilience against extreme provocation from our old friends Pakistan and ofcourse the resurgent face of a Young India with Rahul, Sachin, Jyotiraditya and Milind.

      • Gaurav Mishra 11:43 am on May 19, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        In retrospect, we can attribute all sorts of reasons to the results, but any of these factors could have gone wither way. I believe that the appeal of the Nehru-Gandhi family amongst India’s masses is perhaps the biggest reason for the Congress victory. It’s also useful to remember that Rahul, Sachin, Jyotiraditya and Milind are all in politics not because of their own achievements, but because of their families.

    • revathi 10:16 am on May 19, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      BJP should find a fair, young preferably male with dimples for the next election. Then perhaps the contest will be more equal.

  • Gaurav Mishra 4:48 am on May 14, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Lessons, Lok Sabha, , , , , ,   

    The Report Card on Vote Report India Version 1.0 

    Vote Report India Banner

    The 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections have come to an end and so has version 1.0 of Vote Report India.

    We have had our successes and failures and I have talked about some of them before.

    I think we did a lot of things well –

    - We were able to get the website up within a week, thank to some great work by the Ushahidi and eMoksha teams.

    - We were able to build a number of important relationship, with civil society organizations (like Jaago Re/ One Billion Voters, National Network for IndiaLiberty Institute, Citizens for Justice and Peace, and Women’s Political Forum), traditional media organizations (like Al Jazeera) and new media organizations (like Global Voices, Indipepal, Desipundit, BlogAdda, NGO Post and Digital Democracy). In fact, our partnerships page looks like a literal who’s who of the important players working on the Indian elections.

    - We were able to generate a lot of buzz for Vote Report India, on blogs, on Twitter, and in mainstream media within a very short time.

    - We have been able to build a vibrant Vote Report India community that has been active in supporting us on both the technical and outreach side.

    Here are some things that have not gone well –

    - We haven’t been able to establish a relationship with any big Indian media organizations on one hand, and National election Watch and the Election Commission on the other hand, in spite of some serious discussions.

    - We haven’t been able to integrate the Swift functionality into Vote Report India (aggregating feeds from multiple sources and crowdsourcing the tagging etc.) on our original timelines.

    - We haven’t been able to get users to submit reports in large numbers. We have a little more than 200 reports in the system, which isn’t bad. However, we would have needed many more reports to capture the complexity of the 2009 Indian elections.

    - The voter turnout in all four phases has been low, putting a question mark on the effectiveness of all digital civil society campaigns like Vote Report India.

    Here are some lessons from Vote Report India version 1.0 –

    - It’s still difficult to build a grassroots movement in India exclusively on the internet. Even online campaigns need to be supported by mainstream media for reach and SMS for the feedback loop. We had SMS, but we didn’t have the resources to advertise on mainstream media.

    - In a country like India, which has a free and noisy news eco-system, transparency initiatives like Vote Report India need to not only get original reports from users but also aggregate reports from mainstream media.

    - Transparency, in terms of availability of information in a usable format, is not a big enough incentive for Indian users. Users expected Vote Report India to closeloop the issues and give them feedback, and we were not set up to do that.

    On the whole, I think that we did quite well, given our time and resource constraints.

    Our biggest achievement, I think, was being able to build a vibrant community around Vote Report India and we are grateful for your contribution to the project.

    As I said, this was only version 1.0 of Vote Report India. We will take a short break and then relaunch Vote Report India as a platform to crowd-source the performance monitoring of our elected members of parliament, using the Ushahidi/ Swift engines. We will move the present homepage to 2009.votereport.in and start new pages like 2014.votereport.in for new elections, including local assembly elections.

    Selvam and I, along with the other members of the core team, will continue to devote a substantial part of our time to Vote Report India. We are looking to expand our team, so do write to us at votereportindia@gmail.com, if you would like to become involved in a significant way.

    Once again, thank you for helping Vote Report India make a small difference to the 2009 Indian elections.

    Cross-posted at Vote Report India, Digiactive, and Global Voices Advocacy.

     
    • Paul 6:13 pm on May 14, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Appreciate the candor, Guarav. Looking forward to your talk at Affinity next week.

  • Gaurav Mishra 7:16 pm on May 13, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , Lok Sabha, , , , ,   

    My Article on Digital Civil Society Initiatives in Indian Elections in Hindustan Times 

    An article I had submitted sometime back appeared in Hindustan Times today. It’s a reflection on whether digital initiatives by civil society organizations have worked in the 2009 Indian elections.

    My Article on Indian Elections in Hindustan Times

    Here is the full text of the article –

    E-lection fever

    The successful online poll initiatives and blogs may help India 2014 do a US 2008

    Gaurav Mishra

    One of the ironies of Indian politics is that while the urban middle class complains about corrupt politicians, it neither steps out to contest elections or even cast its vote.

    Mumbaikars proved this right on April 30, when the city registered its lowest voter turnout since 1977 despite the hullabaloo the elite had created post-26/11. Since then, the content and the tone of conversations of the Indian online community have changed. Well to-do youngsters, who earlier shied away from political debates, now seem to thrive on it.

    For the first time in India, online voter-registration campaigns and initiatives have channelled the zeitgeist into constructive conversations and created an online space for civic engagement. It’s because of this groundswell that unlikely candidates like author Shashi Tharoor and danseuse Mallika Sarabhai have stepped out to contest the elections.Even political parties, which often speak to the lowest common denominator, upped the ante and reached out to millions of first time voters through blogs and social networking websites.

    The efforts might not have significantly increased voter turnout. But they have laid a foundation for engaging India’s middle-class youngsters with serious civic issues. It’s a cycle we have seen in the US. In 2004, online engagement didn’t get the nomination for Howard Dean or presidency for John Kerry. But in 2008, it set the foundation for the Netroots movement that Barack Obama tapped into.

    The 2009 Indian elections, perhaps, are similar to the the US elections in 2004.None of the political parties have a charismatic prime ministerial candidate leading from the front. Youngsters are disappointed with the sycophancy in the Congress, wary of communal extremism in the BJP and alarmed by fragmentation in Indian politics with regional parties gaining strength.

    We have seen discussions on section 49(O) and negative voting since 26/11. Perhaps, in 2014, we will see the emergence of a charismatic leader; someone who will capture the imagination of India’s youth with a forward-looking agenda. Maybe, in 2014, India’s 150 million internet users will reach the critical mass required for a real groundswell.

    Perhaps 2014 in India will be akin to 2008 of the US.

    Gaurav Mishra is the co-founder of a citizen-powered election-monitoring platform

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 7:14 pm on May 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , Lok Sabha, , , , , , , , , , ,   

    Predictions and Opinion Polls for the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections in India 

    I had earlier done a roundup of opinion polls and predictions for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections.

    Here’s an updated summary of opinion polls and predictions for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections.

    Predictions and Opinion Polls for the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections in India

    Here’s a Google Doc spreadsheet of the predictions.

    Here are the sources for the predictions: NDTV (After Phase 3), NDTV (After Phase 2), NDTV (Before Elections), DNA (After Phase 3), DNA (After Phase 2), DNA (After Phase 1), DNA (Before Elections), Arun Nehru (After Phase 4), Arun Nehru (After Phase 3), Arun Nehru (After Phase 2), Arun Nehru (After Phase 1), Arun Nehru (Before Elections), TOI (After Phase 3), TOI (Before Elections), India TV (Before Elections), Star-Nielsen (Before Elections), The Week (Before Elections), India Today (Before Elections), Reuters (Before Elections), Business Standard (Before Elections), BJP (Before Elections).

    It seems that the gap between Congress and BJP has come down during the last month. Before the elections pundits were predicting that Congress will emerge as the largest party with 150-160 seats, while the BJP will win 130-140 seats. Now, it seems that the gap between the two parties may be less than 10 seats, one way or the other, with both parties winning 145-155 seats.

    In any case, fewer parties will ally with the BJP, and it will need 175+ seats to have a stab at building a majority coalition, so it still seems that the Congress will be a part of the coalition government. However, almost nobody can say for sure what the coalition will look like.

    Both Rajeev Chandrashekhar and M. J. Akbar predict some serious post-election horse trading.

    What do you think? Will Congress or BJP emerge as the largest single party? Will UPA or NDA emerge as the largest pre-poll coalition? Will the president invite the largest party or the largest pre-poll coalition to form the government? Who will be the next prime minister?

    Also, if I have missed out on any predictions, please do let me know in the comments section.

    Update: QuickTake has put together four great scenarios for the election results.

     
    • manish 2:46 am on May 12, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      UPA WILL FORM THE NEXT GOVT. UNDER LEADERSHIP OF dR. mANMOHAN SINGH.UPA WILL GET AROUND 240(WITH CONGRESS AROUND 170) NDA WILL BE 115 (BJP88) THIRED FRONT 170 AND BALANCE WILL BE FOURTH FRONT.THIS WILL BE WORST PERFORMANCE OF BJP

    • Dr. Anil Khari, M.D. 2:44 pm on May 12, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Keeping in view the above openion poll and the post poll scenario it seems to be a neck to neck fight between Congress and BJP. Finally Congress wil have an edge of nearly 10 – 15 seats, will emerge as the single largest party and UPA will form the next Goverment, in the leadership of Mr. Rahul Gandhi, as to me it seems that Mr. Manmohan Singh will refuse to accept the PM post on health ground, and finally Congress party will elect him as new leader and surely the new young energetic Prime Minister of India.

      I repeat that Mr. Rahul Gandhi will be the next Prime Minister, as Mr. Manmohan Singh will step down on health ground soon or later.

    • DR. ANIL KHARI, M.D. 3:14 pm on May 12, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      As I said earlier in my previous comment. that its neck to neck fight between Congress and BJP. Consolidating most of the openion polls and general views, you all will agree with me it seems Congres will have an edge of at least 10 – 15 seats to emerge as the single largest party and obeviously eabling UPA in a position to form the next Goverment. Upto here its OK, now i have a strong feeling that Mr. Manmohan Singh may not accept the Prime Ministrial post on health ground and we all know its a truth also that his health indeed is poor. He or some other Congress/UPA leader may propose the name of Mr. Rahul Gandi for Prime minister post, that is unanomniously supported by all UPA leaders.

      I have this very, very strong feeling that Mr. Rahul Gandhi will be the next Prime Minister, and finally nearly after two decades we could see an another young, energetic Prime minister, like his dad Mr. Rajiv Gandhi. Finally we could get the rid from these 70 – 80 yrs plus aspirants for PM post. They can not move them selves, how can they moove our India, yes their services may be utilized as advisors in respective fields, but certainly not as Prime minister. We already have seen many of these 70 – 80 plus years Prime Ministers and aspirants for this post. We don’t want to see a prime minister with wheel chairs.

    • Vikash Chandra Naithani 2:34 am on May 14, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      BJP will emerge as a single largest party and NDA will form the next government. Days have gone for UPA and you saw their true colour before elections. Under the prime ministership of Shri L.K. Advani india will grow and become super power of the world. All terorists will be wiped out from India.

  • Gaurav Mishra 2:19 pm on May 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Kenya, Lok Sabha, , ,   

    Vote Report India Featured on America.gov 

    Vote Report India and Ushahidi were recently featured on America.gov on a story on the use of mapping mashups for citizen journalism.

    08 May 2009
    Online Maps Enable Citizens to Report, Track Events

    Internet tool being used to monitor India elections

    By Michelle Austein Brooks
    Staff Writer

    Washington — Online mapping tools like MapQuest and Google Maps are known for helping people get from Point A to B. With the help of some technical experts, these maps can also be used to track and monitor critical events in real time.

    As violence broke out following Kenya’s December 2007 presidential elections, Erik Hersman, who grew up in Kenya and Sudan but was in the United States at the time, realized how difficult it was to get specific information about where violence was occurring. With the help of friends — some in Kenya, others in the United States — he built a simple mapping Web site named Ushahidi (which means “testimony” in Swahili) that tracked the violence.

    In a country where traveling and getting information was difficult, Ushahidi enabled anyone with a mobile phone to report an incident and “say where they are and what’s going on, so we could have some record of what was happening around Kenya,” Hersman told America.gov. The best way to get information “was to go straight to the people, start gauging what was going on in their lives by SMS messages.”

    “We provide a way to source information from areas that aren’t capable of doing it any other way,” he said.

    The information people submitted was displayed on a map, highlighting incident locations and allowing users to click on points to gain more details. Ushahidi’s mapping program, known by technical experts as a crowd sourcing tool, enables users to gather and document a great deal of information gathered from a community on a specific topic.

    Creating such a tool did not require knowledge of cutting-edge technology, Hersman said, noting that the technology had been available for years and it took just two days to build the site.

    SHARING TOOLS

    “Technologists are good at what they do and can create interesting things. And by and large, technologists make a pretty healthy salary, so we don’t have to worry about a lot,” Hersman said. “But we look around the world, and we’re from parts of the world oftentimes that do have struggles. So you look at ways you can use the gifts and talents you have to effect change in those areas.”

    So when Ushahidi’s tracking of the Kenyan elections drew attention from humanitarian groups eager to use a similar platform, Hersman created an open-source tool allowing anyone to take the code and develop their own mapping and tracking tools, “without starting from scratch,” he said. While the Ushahidi team has worked directly with organizations to help them set up their own maps on Web sites, anyone can take Ushahidi’s code and build their own page.

    “There’s real power in creating platforms,” Hersman said. “Here is a basic tool set that allows you to do a number of different things. … We can’t come up with all the instances you might use it for, so let’s just give you something to play with and go from there.”

    Among those who have used the Ushahidi platform is Gaurav Mishra. Mishra, a Yahoo Fellow in Residence at the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy at Georgetown University in Washington, had long been thinking about how technology could be used to promote social change in his home country of India. He saw the value of online tools such as Twitter for reporting the latest information during ongoing events like the November 2008 terrorist attack in Mumbai. But there was a need to find a way to better track events over a sustained period of time, Mishra told America.gov.

    Using Ushahidi’s basic mapping tool and with the help of about 35 volunteers scattered across the globe, Vote Report India was built in a week. A Web site featuring a map enabling average people to report and track election-related events, Vote Report India provides real-time information about the elections. India’s national elections are held over five phases which began April 16 and conclude May 13.

    Visitors to the Vote Report India site can see where incidents of violence, voter bribery, voting machine malfunctions or other problems have occurred. The Web site provides instructions for those who want to report their own event: They can do so via Internet form, Twitter tweet, e-mail or text message. The site also aggregates video and photos of the elections.

    “It’s not that we’re doing something new here. We’re just aggregating everything together,” so all the information is available in one place, Mishra said.

    In the case of Vote Report India, efforts are made to ensure the reported information is accurate; reports are verified and moderated by volunteers. This means that some citizen observations may not make it online. But how much editorial control is exercised is up to the user. In the case of Ushahidi’s map tracking H1N1 influenza, unverified accounts from citizens are included.

    With a number of elections coming up this year, groups in other countries are considering similar voting-report Web sites. Ushahidi is helping a group in Lebanon use the tool to monitor and track its June elections.

    More information about Ushahidi and its code is available on the organization’s Web site. See also Vote Report India.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. For more, see a brief description of the project, the story behind the project and reflections on how well the project has worked.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 1:45 pm on May 11, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Lok Sabha, , , , ,   

    Vote Report India Featured in Indian Magazine Man’s World 

    Vote Report India was recently featured in Indian magazine Man’s World in a story on transparency initiatives related to the 2009 Indian elections.’The Watchdogs of Democracy’ is a great headline.

    Vote Report India Featured in Indian Magazine Man's World

    The story isn’t online yet, so I’ll post the text as an update. In the meanwhile, you can read high resolution scans of the story (page 1, page 2, page 3), thanks to Varun Bubber of Indipepal who has earlier written about political activism and the top ten citizen activism campaigns in the 2009 Indian elections.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. For more, see a brief description of the project, the story behind the project and reflections on how well the project has worked.

    Cross-posted at Vote Report India.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 1:55 pm on May 3, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Lok Sabha, ,   

    Vote Report India in Indipepal Article on the Use of Digital Tools in the Indian Elections 

    Varun Babbur at Indipepal has written a great piece on the use of digital tools in the Indian elections.

    He extensively talks about my own work during the elections, including Vote Report India, India’s First Digital Elections Wiki and my series of posts on the use of digital technologies in the elections.

    In my interview with Varun, I said that India is witnessing its first digital election in which the level of participation from  political parties, civil society organizations, media houses and even corporates has been nothing short of amazing. However, I cautioned that these online efforts will not be enough to change election results as the biggest impact of social media campaigns is still in terms of getting mainstream media attention.

    Do have a look at the Indipepal piece.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. For more, see a brief description of the project, the story behind the project and reflections on how well the project has worked.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 2:23 pm on May 2, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Lok Sabha, , , , , Sashi Tharoor, , , Voter Registration Campaigns,   

    Why Have Voter Registration Campaigns Not Increased Voter Turnout in the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha Elections? 

    Photo courtesy Chhavi Sachdev

    Photo courtesy Chhavi Sachdev

    In the last two days, three different journalists have asked me why the voter turnout in Mumbai has decreased to 43% in spite of voter registration initiatives like Jaago Re and transparency initiatives like Vote Report India.

    I have been shocked by the low voter turnout myself and will be reflecting on it over several posts. Here’s my first attempt to answer that question, partly through the Vote Report India lens.

    We have had 170 odd reports so far on Vote Report India whereas I was expecting close to a thousand reports by now.

    Also, most of the reports are web reports, which is surprising given that we had a SMS short code and users could report incidents by sending a SMS starting with VoteReport to 5676785.

    In terms of the content of the reports, most reports reference a news report. Election Commission Interventions is the most popular category, followed by Voter Bribing, Violence and Inflammatory Speech. The categories with first-hand experience — Forged Vote, Voting Machine Problems, Voter Name Missing and What Went Well — have had few reports.

    So, it seems to me that in spite of more than a hundred blog posts linking to us and a dozen media stories, we haven’t been able to reach out to the people who actually went out to vote and experienced a problem.

    So, I’m a little disappointed with what we have been able to achieve with Vote Report India. I have written about some of the challenges we have faced in my post on the limitations of technology in election monitoring. Still, we have two more weeks and two more election phases and we will be tweaking both the technology and the outreach to increase usage.

    Stepping back from Vote Report India, I do believe that this was an unprecedented election for India in terms of online voter registration, transparency and outreach initiatives.

    In my series on the 2009 Indian elections, I have been writing about election-related internet and mobile initiatives from political parties, civil society organizations, media houses and corporates and tracking the reactions they have generated online.

    These initiatives have tapped into the sense of outrage after the Mumbai terrorist attack, channeled it into constructive conversations, and created an online space for civic engagement. It is because of this groundswell that people like writer Shashi Tharoor , danseuse Mallika Sarabhai and ABN AMRO India chief Meera Sanyal stepped up to contest the elections.

    Perhaps, these initiatives haven’t resulted in a significant increase in voter turnout (and the Voter Turnout in Mumbai has, in fact, decreased) but they have laid a foundation for engaging India’s urban middle-class youngsters into serious civic issues. Talk is cheaper than action, but civic engagement must predate collective action. It’s a cycle we have seen in the US. In 2004, online engagement didn’t get the nomination for Howard Dean, or the presidency for John Kerry, but it set the foundation of the netroots movement that Barack Obama tapped into in 2008. The 2009 elections in India are similar to the 2004 elections in the US.

    Perhaps, in 2014, we will see a charismatic leader emerge on the national scene, who will capture the imagination of India’s youth. In these elections, neither Congress nor BJP had a charismatic prime ministerial candidate leading from the front. Also, young people in India are disappointed with the sycophancy in the Congress, wary of the communal extremism in the BJP, and alarmed by the fragmentation in Indian politics as a result of the growing power of the regional parties. Therefore, we have seen discussions on section 49(O) and negative voting ever since the Mumbai attack. Hopefully that will change in 2014.

    What do you think? Why was the voter turnout in Mumbai a low 44.21% after so many voter registration & transparency campaigns?

    Update: The low voter turnout in Mumbai has generated a lot of discussions both online and in mainstream media. I’ll be updating this post with news reports, op-eds, blog posts and comments on this post and on Twitter, so please do leave behind any relevant links you come across.

    Most people are trying to explain why Mumbaikars didn’t vote.

    On a CNBC-TV18 panel discussion, independent candidate Meera Sanyal, Madhav Bhatkuly from Empowered Mumbai, B Venkatesh Kumar from Mumbai University and Vivek Gilani from MumbaiVotes try to explain the low voter turnout in Mumbai.

    IANS explains the low Mumbai voter turnout by arguing that most Mumbaikars are only concerned about local issues, which were not really highlighted in the election campaigns. Neha Bagoria on Twitter says that most of the educated young voters in Mumbai are from other states for jobs and can’t vote as their names aren’t in voting list. Niyukti on Twitter believes that voter apathy to the ’same old politics’ and heat wave are the two top reasons for lower voter turnout in Mumbai. Bombay Addict says that the apathy of the middle class is the reason for the low voter turnout.

    Harshad Oak argues that the low voter turnout numbers may be a reflection of the Election Commission’s inefficiency, instead of voter apathy. Neelakantan also points to issues with how voting lists in India are maintained.Amit argues that broken voting machines and missing voter names can’t be an excuse for not insisting on voting.

    Randheer Singh develops an elaborate conspiracy theory on why the Indian middle class doesn’t vote. Acron at National Interest calls for a more in-dept analysis of the Absent Indian Voter Syndrome. Yogendra Yadav at The Hindu argues that the only route to build alternative politics is to take politics seriously and painstakingly build political organisations. Arnab agrees that builing political engagement will be a long term process. Rajiv Gowda at DNA argues that asking people to vote isn’t enough; you need to ask them to vote for a candidate they can believe in.

    Mohyna Srinivasan, Vrushali Lad and actor Rahul Bose are shocked and saddened that Mumbaikars didn’t go out and vote. Kamal Chaturvedi didn’t vote himself, but calls Mumbaikars shameless for not voting.

    Subin, Dina Mehta, Chhavi Sachdev and Kayezad Adajania share their experience of voting for the first time. It’s a sad story of missing voter names, confused poll officials and shoddy poll arrangements. Model-turned-writer Shobha De had an easier time voting. Rajesh Jain explains how he ended up not voting for the first time since 1992, because of his name missing from the voter list. Priya Ramani at LiveMint and G Sampath at DNA explain why they didn’t vote.

    Another set of people believe that the expectation that voter turnout in Mumbai would be high was wrong to begin with.

    Columnist Vir Sanghvi is not surprised by the low Mumbai voter turnout and argues that we were deluded in believing that the Mumbai terror attack will lead to higher civic engagement amongst India’s urban youth. Ananth Krishnan blames the media for creating a false expectation of higher voter turnout. Kaushal Karkhanis on Twitter says that most outreach effort focused on the classes, not the masses, who form the majority of voters.

    Finally, a third set of people are trying to think of ways for encouraging people to vote in the future.

    Rediff asks its readers if voting should be made compulsory in India, given the low voter turnout. Mohit Atale believes that the ‘none of the above option’ would have led to a higher voter turnout.

    Edited versions cross-posted at True/ Slant and Global Voices.

     
    • Nolita 4:31 pm on May 2, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      According to me the low voter turn out is an interplay of many small factors… firstly, the date “30th April” was purposefully selected so as to ensure minimal participation of the middle class (the bait was the long weekend), which most people fell for! This in fact was contested by many NGOs who wanted it to be changed to the 29th, but to no effect!

      Secondly, the process of registration was made more accessible to the youth and several others. However, the importance of following-up and verification of the registration was not communicated correctly. Many (including me) are unaware that if you have registered prior to the current election your name will never appear in your constituency, but in a separate supplement! Several naive voters thought that if they simply went with sufficient proof (photo id – passport n PAN card) they would be allowed to vote even if their names were not in the system. On the other hand many think they cannot vote simply cause they do not have their voter ID card!!! To sum it up – the system is intentionally inefficient and ambiguous and we as citizens have just accepted it!

      Lastly, the number of first time voters who registered (and have voted) is substantial… but many people who are already in the system have their registrations duplicated. A whole lot more of deceased people have not been erased from the system! At the end – the calculations add up to a sorry figure which may not be truly reflective of the turnout!

      If I look back at what has transpired over the past few days – voter turn out can probably be improved if people see the immediate effects of their actions, i.e. people vote in local elections (State, BMC) for those who directly impact their lives and then maybe they start to take pride in the concept of democracy!

      • Mohit Atale 2:28 am on May 4, 2009 Permalink | Reply

        There are many who didn’t vote and most of them didn’t because they thought it wouldn’t help as no politicians were as inspirational as Barack Obama. Maybe we need someone like him to inspire people and make them believe that he will bring about the change. And of course he should fulfill those beliefs.
        I agree with Nolita about the system failure and the lack of knowledge of the process.

        • Chevalier 5:54 pm on May 4, 2009 Permalink | Reply

          It’s a big myth that Barack Obama inspired more people to vote or more young people to vote. Voter turnout last year in the US was 56%, compared to 55% in 2004, which is a marginal increase and well in line with year-to-year variance over the last forty years. The turnout of US citizens aged 18-24 was 52% in 1992, 40% in 1996, 40% in 2000, 49% in 2004 and 51% in 2008 – which basically means that 2004 was the big ‘jump’ year, not 2008 (data via Civicyouth). And since youth turnout was also on an increasing trend in the mid-term elections in 2002 and 2006 and not just in presidential elections, their turnout high in 2004 cannot be explained by Kerry or Dean, as easy and widespread as that lasy reasoning is.

          It’s more likely than not, that young people vote when there are issues that catch our fancy, when we feel we can or should make a difference. It’s likely that the Iraq war and the economy and LGBT rights and women’s rights and civil liberties are pulling up turnout much, much more than any personality can, as media-hyped as he is.

    • harini calamur 5:54 am on May 4, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Hello

      on the name exclusion :
      a) the middle class has become fairly removed from the system. most don’t read or speak Marathi – which helps in going to the location to figure if your name is registered.
      b) my father – who is 67 – went to check our names were all there. thrice. they were.
      c) i went to check – our names again – they were there.
      d) we call up vodafone or icici three times -but we won’t go and check if our names are on the elctoral rolls. and then we blame the system.

      finally
      a lot of first time voters – voted
      a lot of older citizens didn’t.
      jago re may have worked in mobilizing the youth. i guess that the older generation went on holidays :)

    • revathi 6:17 am on May 5, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      In my opinion, it was the heat wave .

    • revathi 6:27 am on May 5, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      An optimistic view is that,

      Middle class apathy to elections is well known

      More and more people especially in cities are becoming middle class

      Hence the lower turnout.

      Isnt that good news?

  • Gaurav Mishra 12:46 am on April 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Lok Sabha, ,   

    Vote Report India Featured in UAE Daily The National 

    Vote Report India was recently featured in UAE daily The National.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. For more, see a brief description of the project, the story behind the project and reflections on how well the project has worked.

    Here is the full text of the story –

    Website keeps candidates in line

    Jonathan Spollen, Assistant Foreign Editor

    April 27. 2009 4:00PM UAE / April 27. 2009 12:00PM GMT

    The Indian elections have not been short of incident. Varun Gandhi delivered what some say amounted to hate speech, Maoists attacked poll officials in Chhattisgarh, resulting in seven deaths, and Lashkar-i-Taiba, the Pakistani militant group, has threatened violence.

    Along with scores of other violations of electoral conduct, from bribery to the theft of voting machines, all were duly noted and posted on Vote Report India, a website dedicated to what it calls “citizen-driven election monitoring”.

    The site allows individuals from anywhere in India to report occurrences of misconduct via telephone, e-mail, SMS and blog links, which are then aggregated by the site administrators with news reports, other blog posts, photos, videos and tweets (Twitter messages) of the same incident to verify its truth.

    Set up this month before the first phase of voting to “increase transparency and accountability in the Indian election process”, the site receives about 20 reports a day, though this spiked to more than 60 on the first day of voting, April 16.

    “We are having a lot of success within the online community. There is a lot of awareness, a lot of people linking to us,” said Gaurav Mishra, 29, a core member of VRI’s 35-person team.

    Visitors to the site will find on the home page a map of India scattered with red dots indicating areas where violations have been reported. The bigger the dot, the greater the number of incidents in that particular area or constituency, and clicking on it will bring links to the reports.

    Click on the bloated Nagpur, for example, and you will find 12 reports including cases of bribery and the arrest of a Republican Party candidate for using fake documents.

    Meanwhile, in the north-eastern state of Manipur, 14 electronic voting machines were snatched during polling, while in the western state of Rajasthan, a BJP leader, Jaswant Singh, was caught on camera handing out money to voters.

    Mr Mishra said the most reported violation of electoral conduct so far has been hate speech by candidates against various religions, castes and communities.

    To this end he praised the Indian election commission – many of whose reports VRI carries – for being “extremely vigilant” in such cases.

    Analysts say VRI and other election-monitoring sites and media are forcing politicians to be more accountable and to think twice about indulging in acts that might be seen as corrupt.

    “Politicians are more answerable now,” said Animesh Bhaya, 25, a producer with Star television in New Delhi. “Lots of things used to get covered up, but they are being very cautious now. In the long run [Indian elections] will be more visible.”

    An all-volunteer collaboration between software developers, designers, academics and other professionals, the site has been endorsed by four major human rights and pro-democracy groups and has accrued a number of media partners, among them the Global Voices website and Al Jazeera English.

    VRI’s work spans India, Africa and the United States, Mr Mishra said. “The goal is to spread beyond this.”

    The concept of VRI’s citizen election monitoring, however, comes from the award-winning website Ushahidi.com, which was set up to map reports of post-election violence in Kenya in 2008.

    Ushahidi, meaning “testimony” in Swahili, “crowdsources crisis information” using the original platform – citizen reporting via telephone, e-mail, SMS, etc – that VRI now uses.

    Indeed, half of the VRI team are also involved in Ushahidi.

    Mr Mishra holds a fellowship in communications sponsored by internet giant Yahoo at Georgetown University. He said similar election-monitoring sites are now operating in Congo, South Africa and the Gaza Strip.

    His hope is that the number of reports per day will increase as the Indian elections progress.

    Mr Bhaya of Star TV has no doubt they will. “More and more people have internet now, and they can [make these reports] from the comfort of their own home,” he said.

    “This is making a positive impact.”

    jspollen@thenational.ae

    The article has a couple of small misquotes. The Vote Report India team is spread across India, Africa and the United States, but our focus is squarely on India. Also, the Ushahidi platform has been implemented in Congo, South Africa and Gaza, but it is the first time it has been used for election monitoring. We are hoping that Ushahidi will be used for election monitoring in several more countries and the Vote Report India experience will be useful in these implementation.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. Here’s a brief description of Vote Report India and here’s the story behind the project.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 12:54 pm on April 25, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Lok Sabha, , Polling Booth, , , Vote India,   

    Vote Report India Featured in Indian Daily The Hindu 

    Vote Report India was featured today in Indian daily The Hindu, in a story on the use of internet and mobile technologies in the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. For more, see a brief description of the project, the story behind the project and reflections on how well the project has worked.

    Here is the full text of the story –

    A click away

    Sruthi Krishnan and Priscilla Jebaraj

    The internet is a mine of information on the polls

    You are going to vote but are not sure who the candidates in your constituency are. Or you are not sure where your polling booth is. If you have an internet connection, the answers are just a click away.

    VoteIndia (http://voteindia.in), whose motto is ‘Let’s have a meaningful revolution,’ provides information on candidates through emails. Register on the site by providing your email address and loc ate your home on the Google map provided. Once you do this, the site determines your constituency and ward and sends you the relevant information. The site gets this information from the affidavits the candidates file with the Election Commission.

    Another site that makes use of Google maps is Vote Report India (http://votereport.in). This monitors news and events related to the elections, aggregates it on an interactive map. For instance, if you want to know where “inflammatory speech” occurred, it would highlight locations such as Kandhamal and Pilibhit.

    On Indipepal (http://indipepal.com/politics), you can find the back story of six decades of Indian elections in an accessible graphic format. Whether it’s voter turnout or election expenditure over the years, at the national or State level, or the record of various parties when it comes to women candidates, MPs with criminal records or the extent of participation in Lok Sabha debates, it’s all there. For first-time voters, the site also offers a crash course in Indian political terms and realities.

    At http://mibazaar.com/indianpolitics.html, you can find details about the 128 MPs with criminal records, all mapped out on a Google map.

    Polling Booth (http://pollingbooth.in) gives you your polling booth information, if you feed it your voter ID details. It is available only for Hyderabad district as of now.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. Here’s a brief description of Vote Report India and here’s the story behind the project.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 12:51 am on April 25, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Election Irrgularities, , , , Lok Sabha, , , ,   

    The Limitations of Technology in Tracking Election Irregularities 

    Sanjana Hattotuwa has written a really thought-provoking piece on the limitations of using (mapping) technology to track election irregularities –

    Unless awareness campaigns before an election, and advocacy campaigns after which bring to light, including name and shame, perpetrators of elections violence, these exercises alone, including my own, have little chance of really strengthening democracy.

    Almost all digital activism campaigns can be categorized as successes or failures depending on the standards you hold them to.

    A lot of campaigns succeed in creating compelling content and setting off conversations around it. A few campaigns are able to motivate their constituents to come together to co-create something meaningful. Very few are able to translate this online engagement into offline action. A handful result in fundamental real-world change.

    I’m breaking the first cardinal rule of digital activism here and subjecting my own campaign to serious scrutiny while it is still on.

    People tell me that Vote Report India is already a success, and I guess it is, by most standards. We have a fairly active community of 35-40 volunteers who are helping out with debugging and reporting, promoting the project on social media, and even creating posters and videos to help the idea go viral. We have established a number of important partnerships, more than a hundred blogs have already linked back to the website, and the media stories are beginning to trickle in.

    However, even as I put in twenty-hour days to do justice to Vote Report India, I can’t but feel that we haven’t succeeded at all. We have less than two hundred reports on our system and many of them have been entered by our volunteers. We set out to crowdsource election monitoring, and I have to admit that we have failed so far. And, then, there is the even higher ideal of really making a difference, really making the Indian election process more transparent, really naming and shaming those who try to manipulate it. If I test Vote Report India against that touchstone, we aren’t even close.

    So, I’m really grateful to all of you for blogging about Vote Report India, for promoting it on Twitter and Facebook, for encouraging us with kind words and kind acts, but I need you to do more. I need you to go out and vote and then report your voting experience, and I need you to ask your friends, relatives, and colleagues to do the same. Vote Report India is a platform we built for you, and unless you use it, it will fail, at least in my eyes, even if a thousand blogs link to us, and a hundred news stories mention us.

    The next phase of the elections is on April 30th, and I’m counting on you to vote and report, and help Vote Report India achieve its objective of increasing transparency in the Indian election process.

    Update: Ory Okolloh has earlier written about the challenges in using Ushahdi for crisis reporting in DRC, and the challenges we face are strikingly similar to the ones she talks about.

    In response, Patrick Meier argued that the solution is to use Ushahidi for crowdsourcing early response, apart from crowdshourcing early warning. In practical terms, it means giving users localized information in the form of email and SMS feeds, and closing the loop with officials so that incidents are not only reported but also resolved.

    Indeed, one of the questions we are repeatedly asked by users is: what happens after we report an incident? Although the Vote Report India feed is freely available, and Al Jazeera is using it to import our data into their India election console, our users want more, and we aren’t set up (yet) to offer more.

    Time for course correction.

     
    • Ory Okolloh 4:11 pm on April 26, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Gaurav, it’s important that you’ve realized the challenges early on..I think it’s essential for you to close the loop and answer the “why” question – why should I report? if I report so what? Perhaps link up with an organization that will be pursuing cases of electoral fraud, or get politicians interested in the data from a self-interest point of view, try to get the word out using local media, combine the data with analysis – you have the critical mass from a resource point of view – just apply that to thinking about answering the why question.

    • Gaurav Mishra 9:27 am on April 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      @Ory: I have found that the 'why' question is both deceptively simple and very complex. At the simplest level the answer is that you should report incidents because it's the right thing to do. Reported incidents, even if they aren't resolved, are better than unreported incidents. However, that simple logic, which seems compelling to me, hasn't had much success with our audience so far.

      In terms of local efforts, we haven't made much headway with the Election Commission and National Election Watch, but we have good local partnerships and good local buzz on Twitter, blogs and media. We need to do much more on this front, and we need to implement Swift, so that we can aggregate conversations that are happening elsewhere.

  • Gaurav Mishra 10:59 pm on April 24, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Lok Sabha, , ,   

    Vote Report India Featured on French News Channel France 24 

    French News Channel France 24 recently interviewed me for a TV segment on the use of internet and mobile technologies in the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. We also talked about Vote Report India.

    Here’s the link to the original video. Here’s the video on YouTube

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. Here’s a brief description of Vote Report India and here’s the story behind the project.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 10:25 am on April 23, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Lok Sabha, , ,   

    Vote Report India Featured in Indian Daily Mid Day 

    Vote Report India Mid Day

    Indian daily Mid Day did a nice story on Vote Report India today, and even put up my Introduction to Vote Report India video on their website.

    Here is the full text of the story –

    Don’t just be a voter Now, You Can Also Monitor the Poll Process.

    Votereport.in, a first-of-its-kind citizenpowered platform, allows you to highlight irregularities via SMS, email, or even a Tweet
    Bhairavi Jhaveri bhairavi.jhaveri@mid-day.com

    What could the 26/11 terror attacks, a Kenyan post-election violence blog and one more avid blogger possibly have in common? The mix, as this correspondent discovered, is more potent than you might imagine at first.

    Gaurav Mishra (29) was only a Yahoo! Fellow in International Values, Communications, Technology, and Global Internet in Washington until the Mumbai terror attacks. But the tragedy got him toying with the idea of forming a network for the Indian elections along the lines of the Kenyan post-election violence blogger network, Ushahidi.

    The aim was to increase transparency and accountability, instill a participatory mindset among citizens and provide a complete picture of public opinion during the 2009 polls.

    Armed with these goals and the aid of Internet technologist Selvam Velmurugam (35), Mishra converted his idea into reality on April 6 with the website Vote Report India (VRI). MiD DAY explores the site…
    How VRI works?

    VRI allows users to report violations of the election code of conduct via SMS, e-mail and online complaints. The platform will compile these with news reports, blog posts, photos, videos and Tweets from all relevant sources on an interactive map.

    This means, when you click a point on the VRI map, a timeline of all the incidents related to that location would be displayed.
    “We will eventually do an analysis of incidents to present trends as well,” said Gaurav.

    The dual approach will up transparency levels in the election process, the founders believe.

    A hit already

    The duo believes VRI has managed to throw up great numbers since its launch, as it gives the youth the sense that they have the power to create positive change by making the election process transparent. Over 100 blog posts have been linked to the site and it is receiving 1,000+ page views per day. “We hit 60 reports on April 16. The most popular categories are Election Commission Interventions, Voter Bribing and Violence. As of now, most of the stories are based on stories already reported in the media,” says Gaurav.

    Mishra and Selvam are confident that VRI will be around for future elections. Meanwhile, they are working on another platform for elections around the world, starting with Lebanon in June.

    The team

    While Mishra is involved in research on how Internet and mobile technologies transform society, Selvam has founded eMoksha.org, a non-profit organisation aimed at enabling stronger democracies through increased citizen awareness and engagement.

    “When I was in India, by elections were being held in parts of Tamil Nadu. I heard friends and relatives complain about not finding their names on the electoral roll, or their vote being cast by someone else. I wondered who they would approach,” says Selvam.

    They were supported by 35 other volunteers — with the core team in the US and a handful of partners and local promoters helping them reach out to organisations in India.

    The service is powered by Ushahidi and SwiftRiver, and managed by eMoksha. Ushahidi is an award-winning platform that sources citizen reporting. SwiftRiver is a platform that makes sense of multiple sources of information in a fast-changing crisis situation.

    VRI has also partnered with the Arabic news network Al Jazeera.
    Citizens can send reports via SMS with VoteReport to 5676785, e-mail to report@votereport.in, tweet with the Hastag (#Votereport) or by logging on to http://www.votereport.in. You can even join the group’s communities on Facebook, Orkut, Twitter (@votereportindia), SMS GupShup or Google Groups.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. Here’s a brief description of Vote Report India and here’s the story behind the project.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 12:04 am on April 23, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Comic Project, , , , , Lok Sabha, Poster, ,   

    Breaking News: The Comic Project Creates a Poster for Vote Report India 

    I am delighted that the wonderfully talented folks at The Comic Project have designed a poster for Vote Report India

    Vote Report India Poster by The Comic project

    I absolutely love the tag line: “Vote Ki Vaat Mat Lagne Do” (Mumbai-speak for “Don’t Let Them Screw Around With the Vote”).

    Please feel free to share the poster on blogs and social networks.

    Here are some other election-related posters you must check out at The Comic Project — Shoe Dodging, Congress Poster, BJP Poster, Third Front Poster.

    Vote Report India is a collaborative citizen-driven election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections. Here’s a brief description of Vote Report India and here’s the story behind the project.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 6:11 pm on April 21, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Lok Sabha, , ,   

    Video: An Introduction to Vote Report India 

    Here’s a short video in which I talk about the idea behind Vote Report India, the nice buzz we have generated in the two weeks we have been live, and the challenges and delights of working with a team of 35 volunteers spread across three continents.

    If you have been reading my blog, you must already be tired of hearing about Vote Report India, but if you have missed all my blog posts about it, here’s a brief description and here’s the story behind the project.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 10:45 pm on April 20, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Deccan Herald, , , , , , , Lok Sabha, , No Criminals, ,   

    Vote Report India Featured in Indian Daily Deccan Herald’s Story on the Use of Digital Technologies in the Indian Elections 

    Vote Report India was featured today in a Deccan Herald story on the use of digital technologies in the Indian elections.

    The story also quotes me extensively on why the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections are turning out to be India’s first digital elections.

    In my series on the 2009 Indian elections, I have been writing about election-related internet and mobile initiatives from political parties, civil society organizations, media houses and corporates and tracking the reactions they have generated online.

    Here is the full text of the story –

    Campaigning virtually
    Click and read
    The impact of Internet and mobile technologies on the election campaign has been immense. Metrolife takes a look at the digital initiatives

    Most of us at some point or the other have been guilty of whiling away time in front of the social networking sites, exploring profiles with the only legitimate contribution of increasing the hit rate of the sites. But did you ever imagine that the same exercise could end up making us a responsible citizen and an informed voter?
    The urban youth is fast taking to the digital media as a means of gathering information on election, so the political parties are pulling up their socks and catering to this cross-section for the month-long general elections to the 15th Lok Sabha.

    According to Gaurav Mishra, the co-founder of Vote Report India and also a researcher on Internet and society in emerging countries at Georgetown University, Washington, “This year is primed to be India’s first digital elections as India’s 714 million voters prepare to elect their 543 representatives. They are witness to a range of digital initiatives from political parties, civil society organisations, media houses and even corporates. As a result, some observers are calling it India’s first digital elections. It’s also a test case for the effectiveness of digital technologies in the emerging world.”

    Taking the lead is the BJP online initiative through L K Advani, who in his blog, drawing over 150 comments candidly states: “In my own political life spanning six decades, I have enthusiastically embraced every new communication technology — from the early simple Casio digital diary to iPod and iPhone.”

    And this phenomenon is giving rise to different aspects of online campaigning that are getting bigger and more intense and definitely more creative.

    According to Gaurav’s report, some of the popular online initiatives include Rajesh Jain’s Netcore Solutions, which is running the SMS campaign for the BJP, and has bought an inventory of one billion SMSes for the campaign.

    The campaign for Number Criminals in Politics (nocriminals.org) aims to ensure that no political party gives tickets to candidates with criminal antecedents in the 2009 elections. The campaign is effectively using social media
    platforms like Facebook and YouTube to spread its message.

    Till now, the most successful campaign has been the Jaago Re (jaagore.com) in association with Janaagraha, which started in September 2008 to initiate a voter registration drive in colleges and corporates in 35 cities across the country and to register four million voters.

    Says Ashika, involved with Jaago Re and Janaagraha website that does online profiling for candidates standing for election in Bangalore.

    “We target urban youth who have access to Internet and SMS and have profiled 85 candidates standing for elections from the three constituencies in Bangalore: North, South and Central, in a very non-partisan way. Not all the candidates have the means to reach out to the public through traditional campaigning, so our website gives all that information including, candidate nomination, assets, criminal records etc.”

    And the youth of the City seem to lap it all up. Says Karthik Shetty, a software professional who has been avidly following the elections, “The parties have posted their manifestoes on their websites, which can be read and understood at leisure, making information about their work available on a click.”

    The online brouhaha does not end with elections. Many of these web portals are looking at long term transparency and accountability once the government is elected.

    Says Gaurav, “Vote Report India (votereport.in) is a collaborative citizen-powered election monitoring platform for the 2009 elections. It aims to not only provide the most complete picture of public opinion in India during the month-long elections, but will also work on increasing transparency and accountability in the Indian election process.”

     
    • Nadhiya 1:38 am on April 21, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Wow…. usually online initiatives are supported by offline campaigns and coverages…. but this is just awesome …. an online campaign covered by a publication… to good gaurav sir… keeep rocking…

  • Gaurav Mishra 4:32 am on April 19, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: AllNews, , , , , , IndiaTalks.org, , Lok Sabha, , ,   

    Introducing IndiaTalks.org: What is India Talking About? 

    IndiaTalks.org Logo

    A few months back, I had put up a test social voting site at IndiaTalks.org, using Drupal and Drigg. The idea was to use IndiaTalks.org to channelize the energy of India’s youth to find constructive solutions to India’s many problems. Users could vote or comment on ideas submitted by others or submit their own ideas. The most popular ideas were to be highlighted on the front page.

    I still think that a social voting site for social change is a great idea, and someone should have a serious go at it. However, I had a dozen things in the air, as always, and I didn’t find anyone who would run with the idea, so the project never went beyond the test site stage.

    IndiaTalks.org: Vote Report India Dashboard

    Today, I spent a few hours in the afternoon hacking together an Indian Election Dashboard for Vote Report India, and decided that I had finally figured out what to do with IndiaTalks.org.

    My hope is that IndiaTalks.org will become everyone’s default first stop to track news and opinion about important events happening in India.

    The Indian Election Dashboard ties in nicely with the writing and advocacy (Vote Report India) work I’m doing for the Lok Sabha elections.

    In the near future, you can expect more such dashboards for important events in India that need to be tracked compulsively (and, no, I don’t consider IPL an important event). The compulsive tracking will happen not only on the dashboard, but also on the many blogs I’m now writing at (see the sidebar for a selection).

    IndiaTalks.org is inspired by Popurls and Alltop and built entirely on Wordpress using the wonderful OneNews theme.

    BlogAdda, Dance With Shadows and OneVote.in also had the same (good) idea and beat me to the implementation, but I think there’s room for more than one such platform in India.

    I was telling someone yesterday that one way to ensure that your predictions come true is to do yourself what you predicted others would do. I’m really happy that I have been able to play a small part in making my prediction about the 2009 elections being India’s first digital election come true.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 11:15 am on April 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Bhai Ho, Bharat Buland, , , , , , , , , , Inflammatory Speech, , , , , Lok Sabha, , , , Naveen Jindal, No Crinimals in Politics, P Chibambaram, Section 49 (O), , Shoe Throwing, , Varun Gandhi,   

    India’s First Digital Elections Evoke Strong Reactions Online 

    The world’s biggest election is underway in India and, as India’s 714 million voters cast their ballots in the month-long elections, they are witness to a range of digital initiatives from political parties, civil society organizations, media houses and even corporates. It’s not surprising, then, that the Indian internet community is abuzz with discussions related to various aspects of the elections.

    It’s not only a big election in terms of numbers, it’s a big election for India in terms of timing. Last November, the terrorist attack in Mumbai shook up India’s politically apathetic youngsters and brought them out into the streets. Since then, a series of digital civil society initiatives have sought to channel this newfound sense of civic engagement in the Indian youth into meaningful participation in the political process.

    In the run up to the elections, online conversations in India have been charged with this civic consciousness. Transparency campaigns like No Criminals in Politics and Vote Report India and voter registration campaigns like Tata Tea’s Jaago Re have caught the imagination of urban India’s web-savvy youngsters, with their effective use of social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube.

    Rashmi Bansal believed that, with the campaign, Tata Tea has taken corporate social responsibility further than most brands do. Rajesh Kumar wondered why only beverage companies do election themed social advertising. Indian Homemaker and Chavvi Sachdev shared their experiences with voter registration. Sanjukta did an interesting interview with Jaago Re campaign coordinator Jasmine Shah.

    At the same time, the janus-faced Lead India/ Bleed India campaign by The Times of India has incited mixed reactions.

    Anondan tore apart the Lead India print ad while Rajiv Dingra wondered about the rationale behind the Lead India/ Bleed India dichotomy. On Twitter, several users like Deepak and Kanika, found the Bleed India campaign “funny and creative”, while Sumant and Aadisht believed that Bleed India was “buzz gone wrong” and “badly done sarcasm”.

    BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani’s Obama-style digital campaign consisting of a blog, a blogger outreach program, and an aggressive internet and mobile advertising element, has also evoked strong reactions online.

    Most bloggers, including Sampad Swain, Mayank Dhingra and myself, have praised BJP’s campaign, but some, like blogger-turned columnist Sidin Vadukut have complained that it is an overkill.

    The Congress Party’s Bharat Buland campaign, built around the Oscar-winning song Jai Ho (let there be victory) from Slumdog Millionaire, has attracted a lot of criticism from bloggers like Vinod Sharma, especially after the BJP released a parody titled Bhay Ho (let there be fear).

    Aparna Ray has captured some of the reactions to the BJP and Congress campaigns in previous posts on Global Voices.

    Several bloggers like Rajesh Jain (associated with Friends of BJP), Offstumped are aggressively campaigning for BJP. The #indiavotes09 Twitter feed is dominated by hardcore BJP supporters like @offstumped, @centerofright, and @deadpresident, with only @vimoh and @b50 standing up for Congress.

    Beyond the campaigns, bloggers have been critical of BJP’s Hindutva agenda and the Congress party’s obsession with the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. Bhumika Ghimire has written about these critcisms in a previous Global Voices post.

    The Indian internet community has also been abuzz with discussions on the controversy surrounding Varun Gandhi’s inflammatory anti-Muslim speech and subsequent imprisonment, the incidents of shoe-throwing against Congress politicians P Chidambambaram and Naveen Jindal and BJP leader L K Advani, and the election campaigns of writer Shashi Tharoor , danseuse Mallika Sarabhai and ABN AMRO India chief Meera Sanyal.

    In the midst of this spirit of civic engagement, some people have become fixated on the misguided idea of “negative voting” under section 49(O). Basically, the idea is that voters should have the right to ask for a re-election by selecting a “none of the above” option, if none of the candidates are acceptable to them. A chain e-mail falsely claimed that such a rule already exists. Many bloggers, like Deva Prasad and Vimoh, strongly supported the idea and even called it a powerful agent of change. A Facebook group and an online petition promoting the idea are getting some traction.

    In terms of individual sources, the Outlook India Election Blog is doing a great curation role by linking to important stories from elsewhere. Social networking community IndiPepal has blogs from several well-known analysts. Blogger Chakresh Mishra is doing a series of state-wise pre-poll predictions for the Indian elections. Blogger Manoj Kevalramani is traveling through 11 states in 45 days to get a first-hand impression of the mood on the ground during the election period. The Indian Muslims Blog is writing about the elections from a unique minority perspective. Jai Hind, Indian Election 2009, Indian Elections 2009, Indian Elections, Speak India and Youth Ki Awaaz are some other blogs dedicated to election coverage. BlogAdda and OneVote are doing a great job of aggregating these conversations.

    Cross-posted on Global Voices and Vote Report India, and syndicated via Global Voices to Al Jazeera.

     
    • ebizzkolkata 8:11 am on May 15, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      No dout it is a big question who will next P.M. in india . I think Gujarat’s Chief Minister

      Narendra Modi is the best for this post. He is honest and susessessful person.In his time of

      Chief Minister, Gujarat ineconomic development level very high that is a very good point .

  • Gaurav Mishra 5:24 am on April 15, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Lok Sabha, , My Idea, , , , , , , , Voter Regiatration   

    The Role of Mobile Technology in the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha Elections 

    The world’s largest democracy, India, goes to election starting April 16, 2009. The month long general elections to the 15th Lok Sabha will be held in five phases on April 16, April 22/ 23, April 30, May 7 and May 13, and the results will be announced on May 16.

    As India’s 714 million voters prepare to elect their 543 representatives, they are witness to a range of digital initiatives from political parties, civil society organizations, media houses and even corporates. As a result, some observers are calling it India’s first digital elections.

    Leading from the front is 82 year old Lal Krishna Advani, the prime ministerial candidate of the right wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, who has embarked on a Obama style new media campaign. Part of the campaign are a blog, a blogger outreach program, one of the most aggressive online ad campaigns ever seen in India, and an aggressive SMS campaign that will reach 250 million of India’s 400 million mobile subscribers. Rajesh Jain’s Netcore Solutions, which is running the SMS campaign for BJP, has bought an inventory of 1 billion SMSes for the campaign. Rajesh is also a part of the Friends of BJP group, which is running a social network and an opt-in MyToday-based SMS channel to support BJP’s campaign (Indian Express).

    Other parties are also running similar mobile campaign and, overall, telecom operators expect to make an additional revenue of $10 million from an extra traffic of 3-4 billion SMSes sent by all the political parties, apart from money from multimedia messages, songs and wallpapers (Economic Times).

    Several civil society campaigns are also using mobile technology in interesting ways.

    The Jaago Re campaign was launched by Tata Tea and Janaagraha in September 2008 to start a voter registration drive in colleges and corporates in 35 cities across the country and register four million voters.

    The voter registration itself is driven through an interactive application on its website, which helps users identify their constituency, prepares a ready to print voter registration form in five minutes, guides them to the nearest voter registration center and updates them via SMS when their names are added to the voting list.

    Jaago Re has turned out to be an extremely successful campaign. Not only has it been a topic of a huge number of news stories and blog posts, and resulted in much goodwill for Tata Tea, it has also managed to register 584,000 voters so far.

    Idea Cellular My Idea

    Idea Cellular’s My Idea campaign is a continuation of its participatory democracy ad campaign where a lady politician, aided by her tech-savvy assistant Abhishek Bachchan, gathers the views of the citizens in her constituency using mobile phones –

    The campaign asks people to submit an idea that can change India and vote on the ideas submitted by others. So far, more than 3,000 ideas have been submitted and more than 170,000 votes have been cast.

    Vote Report India Banner Vote Report India, a project I’m personally involved in, is a collaborative citizen-powered election monitoring platform for the 2009 Indian Lok Sabha elections.

    Users contribute direct SMS, email, Twitter and web reports on violations of the Election Commission’s Model Code of Conduct. The platform aggregates these direct reports with news reports, blog posts, photos, videos and tweets related to the elections from all relevant sources, in one place, on an interactive map.

    Vote Report India aims to not only increase transparency and accountability in the Indian election process, but also provide the most complete picture of public opinion in India during the month long elections.

    Vote Report India is built on the Ushahidi and Swift platforms and managed by eMoksha, a non-profit organization that aims to enable stronger democracies through increased citizen awareness and engagement.

    Mobile technology is playing a small but important role in the Indian Lok Sabha elections. Even as the media focus is on the web 2.0 elements in the digital election-related initiatives, it’s the lowly SMS that is likely to make the most difference.

    A slightly edited version of this post was cross-posted in MobileActive.

     
    • nadhiya 7:30 am on April 15, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Likely to make the difference….??????

      there is going to b no change in the democracy in india at least for another 3 0r 4 lok sabha elecions…

      the corruption will continue until more sensible, honest and truly dedicated people make it to the lok sabha….

      Wat differnce is the mobile tech going to make??

      how many of them are aware of the system in our constitution, as per the 1969
      act, in section ” 49-O” ?????

    • Mayav 9:11 pm on April 15, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Cool and informative post Gaurav! thanks.

    • Wais 8:55 am on April 16, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      I’m using this to stay up to date with the elections:

      http://www.demotix.com/loksabha

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel