Tagged: Permission-Marketing RSS

  • Gaurav Mishra 1:06 am on March 17, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Permission-Marketing,   

    Why Should Brands Embrace Social Media? 

    Welcome back to Gauravonomics Blog! Subscribe to my feed now and you'll never miss a single post!

    Quick Summary: Brands should embrace social media because social media will soon be the only cost effective to reach consumers.

    - X – X – X –

    Question: Why should brands embrace social media?

    Answer: Brands should embrace social media because social media will soon be the only cost effective to reach consumers.

    I have noticed two trends both as a marketer and as a consumer –

    Trend 1: The cost of interrupting people with advertising is increasing.

    Tired of the over-clutter of things in their lives, people are going “off” consumption. Tired of the bombardment of commercial messages, people are learning new ways to block out advertising. At the same time, media consumption has become more fragmented. Therefore, it has become more costly to interrupt people with advertising.

    Trend 2: The cost of engaging with people via social media is decreasing.

    “Listening to” consumers, “engaging with” consumer, and “touching” consumers has always been the holy grail of marketing. For the first time, social media allows marketers to “listen to”, “engage with” and “touch” people, both as individuals and consumers, in a cost effective way.

    Why Should Brands Embrace Social Media?

    Today, it’s still more cost-effective (in terms of time + money + goodwill) to interrupt people with advertising than engage with them via social media. That equation will change tomorrow.

    Very soon, social media will be the only cost effective way to reach consumers.

    If you don’t learn how to listen to people today, you’ll discover that you are blocked out of their lives tomorrow.

     
    • Gaurav Mishra 6:43 am on March 17, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      So what`s the tipping point in timeline you are seeing from now ? One year , two year ?

      And if i say Technology part in Social networking Industry is at saturation , Will it be wrong ?

      If not, How do you see technology helping in Social media marketing ?

    • Blr Bytes 9:45 am on March 17, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      I doubt it will flip the model but there will be greater benefits from interactions with social media.

      Particularly fond of the notion of free:
      http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/02/may-i-have-your.html

    • Gaurav 3:28 pm on March 17, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      @Gaurav: I think the tipping point is 2 years away internationally and 5 years away in India.

      @BB: I think the trend will tip. For instance, I’m already impossible to reach via traditional media. I’m sure there are others like me.

      The “economics of free”, by the way, is an altogether different post.

    • Rajesh 11:41 pm on March 17, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      :) – we are not that far behind the west Gaurav. India as a whole? Never maybe….but urban India? Maybe 2-3 years.

      It’s about the tools gaining critical mass and maturity. Some (in fact, many) need to drop out on the way to clean up the clutter before we can see effective usage. Right now, it’s all fragmented (even with the tiny traffic we have, therefore fragmenting it some more).

      Cheers.

      R

    • Gaurav 12:10 am on March 18, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      @Rajesh: I’m setting a really high bar for the tipping point –

      - When interrupting people with advertising becomes costlier than engaging with them via social media (in terms of time + money + goodwill).

      - When the automatic inclusion of social media in the marketing mix becomes ubiquitous.

      - When brand managers are fired for not having a social media strategy.

    • Work from Home Guru 12:41 am on March 19, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      For me Social Media has proved to be a tremendous benefit to my home business. It allows a cost effective way to reach millions of people, what more could you ask for. I figure that one day it will be the only approach marketers use to target customers, as many of the social media sites continue to grow by leaps and bounds.

    • Harshil Karia 12:59 pm on May 24, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      I think there is a danger of social media strategies by brands becoming “interruptive” as well. There are low barriers to entry in social media marketing so everyone seems to be jumping on to this bandwagon but not everyone necessarily understands these qualitative principles.So in a sense there people who are enagaging in interruptive/ disruptive social media engagements are killing the goose that lays the golden egg. There is no doubt that consumers like to be engaged, and that they would undertake an action if need be; at the same time a really large number of consumers are getting increasingly aware of social media marketing and are doubting the credibility of social media related forums as a whole. Social Media forums are one tiny part of social media but you can see where the trend is headed. Care must be taken to ensure that social media marketing does not become “interruption” – and it does when you have a “home business”

  • Gaurav Mishra 11:44 pm on November 1, 2007 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Brick-and-Mortar, Buzz, , , , CPI, , , , , , , Permission-Levels, Permission-Marketing, Search-Ads, , , Text-Ads, , , ,   

    How to Use Digital Media: Ten Tricks for Brick and Mortar Marketers in India 

    Photo by dejay181

    In an earlier post I talked about why marketers should not approach digital media (online/ mobile/ DTH) with the ‘interruption’ marketing paradigm so prevalent in traditional media (TV/ print/ radio/ outdoors): because digital media is very good at engaging with a million customers one at a time, but very bad at reaching a million customers at one time. This is especially true for India, where mass media still hasn’t peaked in terms of either reach or credibility and digital media is still extremely niche and fragmented.

    In another earlier post, I talked about how most marketers and agencies in India are still clueless about the basic principles of digital media. I’m sure that most Indian marketers are present on digital media on the basis of the 5% rule: during a campaign, 5% of the budget should be allocated to digital media. As a result, even when marketers flirt with the digital media, their digital media initiatives are almost always ad hoc, mostly ineffective and often quickly abandoned.

    In my new ten-post series on how brick and mortar marketers in India should use digital media, I’ll describe ten small, but smart, tricks that you can rely on to fully leverage the potential of digital media –

    - Trick #1: Your website is your most important tool. Before you spend a single rupee on online advertising, make sure that your website works both in terms of user interaction and search optimization.

    - Trick #2: You can measure almost anything on digital media. Make sure you are measuring the right things and put in a plan to improve these metrics over time.

    - Trick #3: Digital media allows you to flesh out your prospects into real people. Convert your visitors into registered users as early as possible and increase the richness of the user profile over time.

    - Trick #4: All visitors are not the same. Build capability to allow your visitors to interact with you at various ‘permission levels’ and escalate them to higher ‘permission levels’ over time.

    - Trick #5: Your website is only the first step. Build linkages between your website, your call center, your ERP/ transaction system and your CRM system to track your prospects/ customers on an end-to-end basis.

    - Trick #6: A few relevant impressions are better than a lot of irrelevant impressions. Minimize wastage in ad spends by tightly targeting the right visitors using context-sensitive or social banner ads.

    - Trick #7: Search keywords are a declaration of people’s intents. Use tightly targeted text-based search ads to allow your visitors to self-select themselves. What’s more, pay on the basis of actual clicks by using the CPC (cost-per-click) model.

    - Trick #8: Digital media is great for developing a community and building buzz. Learn from and leverage social networking sites to turn your prospects/ customers into advocates for your brand.

    - Trick #9: Mobile and DTH are both very small in India but will scale up quickly. Use the lessons you have learnt online (how to measure the right things, how to track users on an end-to-end basis, how to use tightly targeted ads, how to develop a community and build buzz) to build competencies on mobile and DTH.

    - Trick #10: Your prospects/ customers are not limited by the medium. Build linkages between different digital and traditional media and your own internal systems to communicate seamlessly with your prospects/ customers.

    In my next post in the series, I’ll focus on the starting point of your digital footprint: your website.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 5:13 pm on October 20, 2007 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Permission-Marketing, Proof-of-Concept, , Spray-and-Pray, , ,   

    Digital Media, Permission Marketing and Proof of Concept 

    Quick Summary: Read about how marketers in India are under-utilizing the power of digital media by relying on interruption marketing rather than permission marketing.

    - X – X – X -

    permission-marketing

    In the last few weeks, I have had some interesting debates with friends who work in the digital media space (online/ mobile/ DTH). While the specifics of the discussions have varied, the underlying theme has been the same.

    My friend X wants me to include online/ mobile/ DTH in my regular media plan. X makes a pretty 100 page presentation to me on the different types of ads I can show on online/ mobile/ DTH. X points out that online/ mobile/ DTH is more measurable than TV/ press/ radio/ outdoors on which I spend a few crores without even thinking about it. X then very tentatively presents the budget slide and suggests that since I’m anyway spending a few crores on TV/ press/ radio/ outdoors, I shouldn’t hesitate in spending a few lakhs on online/ mobile/ DTH. At this point, I totally shock X by telling her that my budget for online/ mobile/ DTH is unlimited, but I’m not interested in doing any of the activities she has suggested to me.

    I’m not a big fan of traditional media, because it is based on the “spray and pray” or “interruption” model of marketing. You basically spend as much as you can and hope that you’ll cut through the clutter of a million other brands doing exactly the same, interrupt your customer in the middle of whatever she is doing and tempt her to whip out her cheque-book and walk into your showroom. You don’t know how well it has worked, you don’t even know whether it has worked at all, but you still do it month after month because you know no better.

    Digital media works best when you abandon the “interruption” model of marketing and move to a “permission” model of marketing. In the “permission” model of marketing, you still interrupt the customer, but you do not ask her to buy your product. Instead, you ask her to give you permission to engage with her, then escalate the level of the engagement over time, so that she eventually wants to buy your product herself. Permission marketing is not about trying to reach a million customers at one time, it’s about engaging with a million customers one at a time. Digital media is not about trying to reach a million customers at one time, it’s about engaging with a million customers one at a time.

    So, I’m not interested in knowing whether the total number of internet users in India is 15 million or 50 million. I’m not interested in knowing whether the number of impressions on site A is one-tenth more than the number of impressions on site B. I’m not even interested in knowing whether the CTR (click-through ratio) of one particular type of banner ad is 0.05% higher than the CTRs of the other one thousand and one types of banners.

    I’m interested in knowing if digital media allows me to engage with my customers in a fundamentally different manner than traditional media. I’m interested in knowing if it allows me to do it at a significantly lower cost than traditional media. Most importantly, I’m interested in knowing if it allows me to measure both the nature of the engagement and the cost of enabling it with significantly higher precision that traditional media.

    But let’s go back to my friend X who works in the digital media space. I want to tell X that my budget for online/ mobile/ DTH is indeed unlimited, as long as it pays for itself. I also want to tell X that I’m not interested in doing any of the activities she has suggested to me because all of them are based on the “interruption” model of marketing and using digital media for “interruption” marketing would only prove that it doesn’t work, whereas I want to prove that it does work.

    And, finally, in response to X’s parting repartee on how marketers expect too much from digital media and too little from traditional media, I want to tell her that only marketers who expect too much from digital media would help establish proof of concept for digital media, and, yes, I agree, it is an unfair world.

    But, enough about what marketers should not do on digital media. Coming up next, some ideas on what marketers should do on digital media.

     
    • Ranjan 8:55 pm on October 20, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Permission marketing need a lot of patience and care. I rarely see marketers having that, especially in India.

      Looking fwd to ideas on the metrics for permission mktg. in India

    • Karthick 4:54 pm on October 26, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      I love Seth Godin. And i was directed here by Melody. And so far you have an interesting blog (interests being Marketing, Blogging and Personal Development :D )

    • Rajesh 10:16 pm on November 27, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Interesting.

      From views to engagement to purchase is a journey that marketers in India have so far been able to avoid given that the primary vehicles of media consumption are still print/ television.

      Brands that do indeed see the opportunity to begin early and ‘engage’ over ‘views’ would be rewarded, but the approach is different and very few brand managers even understand this – like someone said the other day “No one loses her/ his job because of it yet, so it doesn’t matter.”

      R

    • Gaurav 10:26 am on November 28, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      @Rajesh: Totally true.

      What makes it even worse is that the people who are supposed to understand it — digital content owners, digital marketers and digital agencies — are still stuck in the reach/ frequency paradigm, probably because the numbers (in terms of billings/ commission) simply do not add up for targeted, engagement-centric campaigns.

      Every time I try to do a targeted engagement-centric online/ mobile campaign, I first have to say “no” to an avalanche of “but what about reach?” silliness.

      This happens so often that, sometimes, I end up wondering if I’m totally deluded in thinking that digital media must be about more than reach/ frequency. :D

    • Rajesh 11:24 am on November 28, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Not alleging anything but engagement is hard-work and not the easy 15% or whatever % commission on YOUR spend. You spend I earn. Why change that model? :)

      That’s where fundamentally I like public relations over advertising/ offshoots thereof.

      Cheers.

      Rajesh

    • Gaurav 12:46 pm on December 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      @Rajesh: I’m not yet asking myself the “advertising or public relations?” question, but I am searching for a less intrusive, more people-centric model of marketing.

    • Sumant Srivathsan 7:22 pm on March 24, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      I think there’s a bigger issue at hand here. Your friend X seems to be presenting an advertising budget, rather than a marketing plan. While this has more to do with her role in the machine, it also blinds her to non-commercial engagement or branding opportunity. A common tendency is to dismiss these opportunities as PR initiatives, and focus on what makes money for the agency.

      The concept of 360-degree marketing hasn’t covered the internet as a medium in India, and for most brands, it’s purely because of reach (engagement is all about mindspace, and currently, TV gets you more of it than any other medium available). The critical mass that is necessary in order to do online brand-engagement exercises simply does not exist yet. So when HUL wants to spend money on brand-building, they’ll do roadshows in Indore rather than build and promote a skincare website. This will change, but not today or tomorrow.

    • Gaurav 11:57 am on April 2, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      @Sumant: I’m sure you have a first-hand insider’s perspective on the issue because of your work-experience. ;-)

      Yes, I agree with you, Indian marketers and agencies keep doing wrong things on the internet, because the numbers don’t yet add up for the right things.

    • Maninder 2:32 am on November 8, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      I think am little late in reading this article. But its a good read. I dont agree with with the thought the digital media is not about Reach. Mobile today can reach more than 250 million people. This defies your statement about REACH because digtial entails Mobile, OOH n Online advertising.

      Second Comment on CTR: CTR's are always important. You should be interested in knowing if site A has more CTR than site B. Engagement can be there in the banners or on the page where your banners are leading me to. I agree, CTR is not the only evaluation metric. http://brandstreet.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/vie... read this if it helps explaining my POV on CTR.

      I agree to the fact the digital medium allows for greater engagement. But it does not mean it should only me used for engagement purposes only. For example, in a B2B scenario there may be a very little scope for the same. So, I think ite better to stick to brand objectives rather than touting engagement everytime someone talka about digital medium.

      As a marketer, being a fan of one medium or the other does not help. Best is to remain media agnostic and see how your brand objectives can be achieved more efficiently.

      Hope am making sense

    • Maninder 7:32 am on November 8, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      I think am little late in reading this article. But its a good read. I dont agree with with the thought the digital media is not about Reach. Mobile today can reach more than 250 million people. This defies your statement about REACH because digtial entails Mobile, OOH n Online advertising.

      Second Comment on CTR: CTR's are always important. You should be interested in knowing if site A has more CTR than site B. Engagement can be there in the banners or on the page where your banners are leading me to. I agree, CTR is not the only evaluation metric. http://brandstreet.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/vie... read this if it helps explaining my POV on CTR.

      I agree to the fact the digital medium allows for greater engagement. But it does not mean it should only me used for engagement purposes only. For example, in a B2B scenario there may be a very little scope for the same. So, I think ite better to stick to brand objectives rather than touting engagement everytime someone talka about digital medium.

      As a marketer, being a fan of one medium or the other does not help. Best is to remain media agnostic and see how your brand objectives can be achieved more efficiently.

      Hope am making sense

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel