Tagged: Politics RSS

  • Gaurav Mishra 5:57 pm on May 23, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Politics, Power Structures,   

    Netfluence.org: Do Networked Technologies Influence Political Power Structures? 

    Welcome back to Gauravonomics Blog! Subscribe to my feed now and you'll never miss a single post!

    DigiActive co-founder Mary Joyce and I are delighted to announce our new co-authored blog Netfluence.org, which is an investigation into whether and how networked technologies influence political power structures.

    The debate on whether internet and mobile technologies are transforming traditional power structures is dominated by three divergent narratives.

    According to the first, utopian, narrative, internet and mobile technologies enable individuals to publish and distribute content, self-organize into communities of interest and participate in collective action. As a result, they can create new types of media outlets, build new types of civil society organizations, and monitor, protest against and even bring down governments. Even though these new degrees of freedom are far from universal, they are fundamentally changing political power structures. The future has already arrived, this narrative insists, it’s just not evenly distributed yet.

    According to the second, status quo, narrative, power structures are ingrained into our society’s institutions, and internet and mobile technologies don’t really change these institutions, or create new ones. The case studies compiled by the utopians constitute anecdotal evidence, at best, and the influence of networked technologies will always be limited because of issues related to access or ability. So, internet and mobile technologies are a minor influence on political power structures, at best.

    According to the third, dystopian, narrative, internet and mobile technologies are, in fact, enabling traditional institutions to further consolidate their power through censorship, surveillance and propaganda. So, even though they give us the illusion of greater power, they have, indeed, compromised our ability to protect our privacy, have access to diverse views, and build real institutions.

    Both of us have roots in the digital activism community, so our natural bias is towards the first narrative. However, we have seen enough evidence for and against all three narratives that we felt the need to objectively investigate their relative merits.

    We will look at the interplay between networked technologies and political power structure through different lenses. We will explore if the power dynamics between individuals and institutions is changing. We will ask if power is shifting from states to non-state actors. We will also investigate if these technologies are leading to the formation of new types of (non-commercial) (non-)institutions.

    By delving into books, academic papers, and news articles, by engaging in formal and informal conversations with thinkers and practitioners, and through first hand involvement in projects that seek to subvert political power through the use of internet and mobile technologies, we will compile a collage of perspectives that will hopefully result in a book worthy of your attention.

    Our first big question, and the topic of our next post: how are internet and mobile technologies changing diplomacy?

    Cross-posted on Netfluence.

     
  • Gaurav Mishra 1:00 am on March 21, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Campaign, , , , , , , Politics   

    India’s First Digital Election Wiki 

    One of my seven social media predictions for India for 2009 was that internet and mobile technologies will play an important role in the 2009 Indian general elections.

    I had said that we will see an unprecedented amount of online debate on the many problems facing India and even specific political parties and candidates. We will also see a serious “get out the vote” campaign to get more young people to go out to vote. We will also see some politicians experiment with social media tools, hoping to replicate the magic of Barack Obama’s US presidential campaign. The Lok Sabha elections for 2009 may even produce India’s first tech Prime Minister.

    I’m happy to tell you that all that is happening and the upcoming elections are all set to be India’s first digital elections. Over the weekend, I’ll be working on a longish post to highlight these efforts, so stay tuned.

    I have also created a wiki titled ‘India’s First Digital Election‘ to compile a database of internet and mobile initiatives being used in the 2009 Indian general elections by political parties, individual politicians, and civil society groups.

    I would be grateful if you could add details of websites, blogs, Twitter IDs, Facebook pages/ groups, Orkut groups and other initiatives to the database and encourage others to do so.

     
    • MP 8:46 am on March 21, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      If you look carefully, digital election campaigns are being managed rather poorly. Its not that political parties have realised the power of internet. It’s just that Obama used it and won. Using a media does not help unless you know how you are using and more importantly what are you using it for.

  • Gaurav Mishra 4:23 am on January 9, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , Lalu Prasad Yadav, Omar Abdullah, Politics, ,   

    Social Media in Indian Election 2009: Will BJP Leader Lal Krishna Advani Become India’s First Tech Prime Minister? 

    One of my seven social media predictions for India for 2009 was that social media will play an important role in the 2009 Indian general elections.

    Young people in India are more engaged with politics than ever in the aftermath of the 11/26 Mumbai terror attack and this engagement will carry through to the 2009 elections.

    I believe that we will see an unprecedented amount of online debate on the many problems facing India and even specific political parties and candidates. We will also see a serious “get out the vote” campaign to get more young people to go out to vote. We will also see some politicians experiment with social media tools, hoping to replicate the magic of Barack Obama’s US presidential campaign. The Lok Sabha elections for 2009 may even produce India’s first tech Prime Minister.

    I think that we saw the first tentative steps in that direction when BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani started a blog yesterday (via Soumyadeep).

    The first blog post talks about how he has seen election campaigning change between 1952 and 2009 and explains his reasons for starting a blog –

    Welcome, friends, to my blog. My young colleagues who have created this website told me that a political portal without a blog is like a letter without a signature. I quickly accepted this compelling logic.

    I am excited by the idea of using the Internet as a platform for political communication and, especially, for election campaign.

    The Internet has many attractive attributes, but the best perhaps is that it is owned neither by the government nor by any private media groups. It is open to all and in this sense it is the most democratic of all the communication platforms invented by mankind so far.

    I’m sure the posts are ghost-written, but so are most political speeches (even for president elect Obama), so that is to be expected. The tone of the post is conversational. Mr. Advani promises to write more soon (update: and writes another post within two days), and asks the readers to subscribe to his blog. The blog even allows comments, even though the comments are moderated. So far, all the sixteen approved comments are strongly positive.

    As a test, I have left the following respectful but mildly critical comment on the post –

    Dear Mr. Advani,

    Welcome online. I don’t always agree with BJP’s philosophy, but it is great to see you embracing blogs and forums to speak to young people in India. I hope that you will continue to use these tools. I also hope that your campaign team will actively engage with your readers, so that your blog and forum become a platform for meaningful debate instead of a one way communication channel.

    Regards,

    Gaurav Mishra

    Let’s see if my comment is approved. My comment has been approved, so it seems that mildly critical comments are fine, as of now. Let’s see if it changes when a real debate starts in the comments section.

    His website, http://www.lkadvani.in, was launched on November 8, 2008, on his 81st birthday, even though it had been planned since March 2008 ( Mohua Chatterjee in TOI). The website generated very little buzz in the Indian blogosphere but most bloggers welcomed the initiative (see Sampad Swain and Mayank Dhingra).

    The website aims to bring alive the persona of Mr. Advani as prime ministerial aspirant, apart from providing information about his election agenda. The website launched with about 150 videos, over 300 photographs and more than 700 pages of textual content (via AlooTechie) and his recent public appearances, speeches, and press releases are regularly updated on the website. The forum section of the website has moderate activity with 1600+ members writing 2500+ posts in 1000+ categories, hardly the numbers that change the course of an election. The website allows users to register to receive email and SMS alerts on Mr. Advani’s events and volunteers desiring to work on the campaign can also submit their applications through the website.

    In April 2008, the Press Trust of India had reported that the planned website was part of an overall campaign, run by a special ‘command office’, to revamp Mr. Advani’s image in the run up to the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.

    The first task for the Advani command office was the creation of the website for his book My Country, My Life in April 2008 (NDTV). The website even had a blog, but it included links to other people’s post about Mr. Advani, instead of posts written by Mr. Advani. One one hand, it shows that Mr. Advani’s campaign team was listening to blog conversations about him. On the other hand, it also shows a lack of familiarity with how blogs actually work.

    The command office also intends to use “permission marketing” to reach out to the electorate through calls on mobiles and SMSes.

    After the US elections, Sakshi Didwania at the Reuters Blog had wondered if the younger Indian politicians will follow in Obama’s footsteps and embrace the internet. The post noted that even as tech savvy Indian politicians like Rahul Gandhi, Milind Deora, Sachin Pilot and Jyotiraditya Scindia from the Congress and Arun Jaitley from BJP maintain an extensive data base of electorates and voting patterns in states and constituencies, they are missing out on an opportunity to leverage the power of the internet in their electoral campaigns.

    In July 2008, Rama Lakshmi at Washington Post reported that Mr. Advani’s online campaign is indeed inspired by Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. However, political historian Ramachandra Guha rejected such comparisons between Advani and Obama –

    That particular campaign style worked for Obama because he is a young, fresh-faced, charming man who promises change. But Advani has too much baggage, both good and bad, attached to him. It strains one’s credulity to imagine the austere, unsmiling Advani being rebranded like Obama.

    Even as Mr. Advani embraces web 2.0, India’s tech-savvy younger politicians still seem to be stuck in the pre-internet era.

    Both the BJP and Congress websites are strictly web 1.0. The situation is so bad that even the launch of a basic website by the Delhi unit of the Congress party has prompted TOI’s Ambika Pandit to talk of a “high-tech” political battle between the two political parties.

    So far, only Lalu Prasad Yadav (railway minister and former Bihar chief minister) and Omar Abdullah (president of the Jammu and Kashmir National Conference) have experimented with blogging. Mr. Yadav’s blog, however, is hosted in the ‘celebrity blogs’ section of the entertainment website MyPopKorn, so I’m not even sure if I should count it as a serious blog.

    The only Indian politician on Twitter is BJP’s V K Malhotra, (@VKMalhotra).

    Such skepticism on the importance of the internet in Indian politics has valid reasons, given that less than 5% of Indians have internet access.

    However, technology can not only be used to present a prime ministerial candidate to the Indian electorate, it can also be used to showcase him to an International audience.

    BJP has a reputation of being a right wing, Hindu nationalistic party, and Mr. Advandi is more right wing than most BJP leaders. While such a reputation can come handy in winning an election, it will quickly become cumbersome when Mr. Advani is sitting in the prime minister’s chair.

    I’m sure the thought of rebranding Mr. Advani to the world has crossed the minds of his campaign team (and, if it hasn’t, it should have), even though the content on the website, and the AdWords campaign to promote it (Abhishek Jha), seems to be mostly targeted at an Indian audience.

    Still, Mr. Advani’s online campaign is a step in the right direction and will prompt at least a few other prominent politicians to start their own blogs.

    I’ll be tracking the role of social media and mobile tools in the 2009 Indian elections in a separate category: Indian Elections 2009. Stay tuned.

    Cross-posted at Social Media in Business, Development, and Government.

     
    • Yu Yu 5:49 am on January 9, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      I have two questions:
      1. Do you think it’s actually written by him or ghost written with the general direction of someone in the higher up in charge of his campaign? It sounds way too “conversational” of a style to me. Then again, I’ve never heard, or remembered him speak in English.
      2. Why do you think the Indians politicians waited this long? Blogs had been around for ages, and made headlines in India for a couple of times. Why now? Why wait the success of a US campaign and not make head way before?

    • Gaurav Mishra 11:14 pm on January 9, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      @Yu Yu: I’m sure the posts are ghost-written, but so are most political speeches (even for president elect Obama), so that is to be expected. Also, skepticism on the importance of the internet in Indian politics has valid reasons, given that less than 5% of Indians have internet access. However, technology can not only be used to present a prime ministerial candidate to the Indian electorate, it can also be used to showcase him to an International audience. That’s something Indian politicians don’t seem to have thought about.

    • Yu Yu 4:59 am on January 10, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      More questions: :-)
      Right after the Mumbai tragedy, Times of India surveyed the major metro cities in India. They found that a lot of businesses, the middle class and educated wanted to mobilize and change the system. We also saw that there were more voter turnouts in the subsequent elections.

      Do you think this new initiative by politicians to get into social media, the Internet etc. has something to do with that? To lobby the young educated voters? If so, is it going to last long? Do you think more politicians will adopt this strategy?

    • Prakash Sreewastav 5:25 am on January 10, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Gaurav, watch our for Chandra Babu Naidu from AP – he could emerge as the most technology friendly and experimental politician. I live in Hyderabad and have already started getting SMS’s from Naidu. Today I got an SMS wishing me Happy Shankranti!

      I am sure that this has been inspired by the Obama campaign. Everyone remembers how Naidu singlehandedly made Hyderabad (and Cybderabad) an IT destination in India and surely he would ride this wave.

    • Prashant Issac 8:50 am on January 16, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      couldnt agree more with your analysis:) — i went on to check for websites of other political leaders, but advani clearly emerges as a winner.. i have my musings posted on http://www.prashantissac.wordpress.com and at http://www.alwaysthroughstruggle.blogspot.com

    • Avinash Narula 3:27 am on January 17, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Hi Gaurav

      this is a great blog that you have started. I am also working hard to make people aware of politics. As you say young Indian are taking part in politics is right but where should they go. they have limited option go to congress or BJP. but the corruption and bureaucracy will remain same. I thing a common man should stand and start fighting for his rights. most people keep shouting from outside. I think its time to stop shouting from out site and get in to politics. We need to clean the mess and make a new start.

    • ravi tharwani 4:43 am on January 31, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      this is the new era india

    • Saurabh Pandey 12:59 am on February 20, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Great posting! and great questions put-up here! Gaurav, though only about 4 odd% people have internet access in India, but one cannot deny the power of youth! Almost 36% of eligible voters are youth, and only about 9% of eligible youth voted in the last general election.
      In that youth and internet should be important components of any political strategy.

      There’s an elaborate presentation that I have created and left for free download and sharing at http://www.atomthought.com.

      or

      One can also visit this link to directly download the same from slideshare.net http://tr.im/gzLZ

      regards

    • Rajdeep 3:28 am on March 24, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Hi Gaurav,
      Your points are well made and you yourself agree that all of it is ghost blog. BJP is just spending money on web advertising and they are not engaging with people. So it is not social media strategy at all. it is just money power. in my toostep community, there was a debate on whether BJP will benefit from all of this and the votes till date have been NO. .
      Indian politics is still a long way to go. more important issues are always religion and caste and therefore they can’t discuss the same with intellectuals

    • Sahil 5:29 am on April 4, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      I just dropped in to ask everyone here that though using the internet is not an evil for those politicians, but should the use SMS. BJP has launched an sms campaign, and is aggressively msging to random numbers. I hate sms even from the operators, and have applied for DNC and but still getting sms on my private number. Can anyone tell of how to stop these? Am least interested in some 80+ Advani sending SMS on my private number.

    • GS Abrol 11:06 am on April 6, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Hay guys lets check out this site http://www.mymp.in it has some really cool features like rate your mp, kaun banega mp it has also listed out the issues on which you should make your MP accountable: jobs, education, health, water, roads, communication and so on.
      and a whole lot of other stuff.So check it out now.

    • sasidar 1:53 am on May 24, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      many had expected him to be the next PM. it was very unfortunate for the BJP.

  • Gaurav Mishra 12:13 pm on January 3, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: #dontgo, , Conservatives, Conservatives on Twitter, , Democrats, Netroots, Politics, Rightroots, , US Politics   

    Can Technology Help the Republican Party Reinvent Itself? 

    There’s widespread agreement that online and mobile tools played an important role in Barack Obama’s presidential campaign.

    Driven by the fear of a widening technology gap between the Democrats and the Republicans, many conservatives are discussing how the Republican party can use technology to reinvent itself.

    Rebuilding the Party proposes a ten point action plan to strengthen and modernize the Republican Party –

    Winning the technology war with the Democrats must be the RNC’s number one priority in the next four years. Barack Obama and the Democrats’ ability to build their entire fundraising, GOTV, and communications machine from the Internet is the #1 existential challenge to our existing party model.

    The technology gap will not be solved by funding multimillion dollar white elephants, but by unleashing free market competition among trusted entrepreneurs and volunteers who want to help the party. We must look beyond conventional political approaches to the Web, learning from technology hubs like Silicon Valley, and being unafraid to be the first in politics to adopt the changes in technology that are revolutionizing the consumer market.

    Obama tapped the Internet successfully because he made it about “you” and “us” not “me” and “I.” You were invited in. You were a key part of his campaign/movement. Your help was truly appreciated. Republican candidates need to grow more comfortable talking in these terms and focus less on being inaccessible objects of hero worship (the “me/I” strategy).

    Only “us” will be powerful enough to fund the first $1 billion Presidential candidate. By embracing the Politics of Us, the Republican Party can rediscover its roots as the party of individual liberty and build a truly modern political army.

    Ed Kilgore in The Democratic Strategist critiques the plan and says that the Republican Party doesn’t need new technology, it needs a new ideology —

    What jumps out at any reader of “Rebuild the Party” is the virtual invisibility of any ideological issues, and the extent to which the “plan” is a faithful imitation of the nutsier and boltsier sections of Crashing the Gate, the book-length 2006 netroots manifesto written by Markos Moulitsas and Jerome Armstrong. There’s lots about the revolutionary nature of the internet as a vehicle for organizing, fundraising, and communications; lots about the need for a younger and more diverse generation of activists and candidates; lots about rebuilding party infrastructure and competing in all fifty states.

    The “rightroots” movement is missing a key ingredient that helped make the netroots blueprint so successful: a preparatory period of ideological ferment.

    In sum, the sort of technological breakthroughs and sheer fresh air the “rightroots” apostles want to appropriate for the GOP were an important part of what finally brought the Democrats back to majority status, but were not ends in themselves; didn’t happen overnight; and weren’t accomplished while pursuing an ideology that hadn’t changed in thirty years. And that’s why the latest Republican “reform” effort may well fail.

    Julian Sanchez at Ars Technica also believes that technology alone can’t solve the Republican Party’s woes –

    Conservatism has much bigger problems right now than a paucity of Twitter skills. (I say this, for what it’s worth, as someone who’s often classified as part of the broad “right,” my frequent criticisms of this administration notwithstanding.) Front and center is that the end of the Cold War and a governing party that made “small government” a punchline has left it very much unclear what, precisely, “conservatism” means. The movement was always a somewhat uneasy coalition of market enthusiasts and social traditionalists, defined at least as much by what (and who) they opposed as by any core common principles. The Palin strategy—recapturing that oppositional unity by rebranding the GOP as the party of cultural ressentiment—is just a recipe for a death spiral. Conservatives don’t need to figure out how to promote conservatism on Facebook; they need to figure out what it is they’re promoting. To the extent that a new media strategy is part of opening up that conversation, great, but it had better not become a substitute for engaging in some of that painful introspection.


    Patrick Ruffini at The Next Right
    feels that the message versus technology debate is unnecessary for the conservative party –

    Conservatives are balkanizing into “ideas” or “tech” camps needlessly. Because of the magnitude of the GOP loss, there is an unfortunate sense that we don’t know where to begin. Fixing any one thing would not have stemmed the tide. That’s why we need to at least try to fix everything starting now. That means revamping our ideas and rebuilding our (technology) infrastructure.

    Attacking technology as a way to rebuild the party misses the point in another way. It assumes that technology is just a tool — that it doesn’t change the dynamics of the political process itself. And that it can’t be an instrument in nudging along the kind of change we all want on the issues and ideas front.

    Ideological reformation cannot happen in a vacuum. To the extent we already know what the principles are, the most effective mechanism for change is to elect as our leaders people who value those principles. In that fight, new infrastructure matters and technology specifically. If our primary communications mediums are still about the few broadcasting to the many, that won’t promote real bottom-up participation in the process, and entrenched interests will continue to win at the expense of the grassroots.

    The problem, however, is that the right doesn’t “already know what the principles are” and refuses to acknowledge it. In the absence of a compelling ideology, initiatives like the #dontgo “movement” or conservatives on Twitter remind me of the orchestra that played on as the Titanic sank.

     
    • anish 1:40 pm on January 3, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      Hey Gaurav!
      Thanks for the compilation, great to read!

    • jrandom42 11:02 pm on January 3, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      The Republicans don’t stand a chance of “re-inventing” themselves, unitl they rethink and redo their policies and positions. Evenythig else is just smoke and mirrors.

    • Gaurav Mishra 2:08 pm on January 4, 2009 Permalink | Reply

      @Anish: Thank you for the kind words.

      @JRandom42: I agree with you.

  • Gaurav Mishra 3:41 pm on December 20, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Politics, Tweetminister, , twitter Congress, Twitter Parliament, ,   

    Twitter and Politics: Check Out UK’s Tweetminister and USA’s Tweet Congress 

    While I was putting together my social media predictions for India for 2009, it was clear to me that social media will play an important role in the 2009 Indian general elections —

    Specifically, we will see Twitter and other mobile based applications like SMSGupShupand MyToday playing an important role in the 2009 general elections, both in the campaigning and in the coverage of the elections.

    Today, I came across two examples of what is possible at the intersection of Twitter and politics: Tweeminister in the UK and Tweet Congress in the USA (via Mashable). Both websites aim to connect constituents with politicians by tracking the politicians who are active on Twitter and encouraging others to join Twitter.

    Twitter Politics TweetMinister UK

    Twitter Politics Tweet Congress UK

    Given that some Indian politicians are already beginning to experiment with social media (BJP’s V K Malhotra, for instance, has a Twitter account @VKMalhotra), I don’t see why we can’t have Twitter Parliament for India. Thoughts?

    Update: TechPresident speculates that Twitter may become the preferred outpost for political outsiders –

    And if the Internet is big enough to be co-opted for mainstream use, where do the insurgents go? They go to Twitter, which (at least for now) is still an outpost that favors the scrappy, authentic outsiders — kind of like the early Internet. Relative longshot candidates are using Twitter to fundraise. It’s also the ultimate cut-the-BS medium — it’s low-cost enough that principals can plausibly maintain their own accounts, and instantaneous and conversational enough that you can really tell when they actually are.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel