WSJ Story on SMS-Based Social Networking Platform SMSGupShup
Welcome to Gauravonomics Blog! Subscribe to my feed now and you'll never miss a single post!
I was quoted recently in a WSJ article on SMS-based social networking platform SMSGupShup. The article delved into the business model for SMS based social networking platforms in India and focused on the need to limit usage to control outgoing SMS costs –
Analysts say restricting the number of user exchanges is the only option SMS GupShup has to hold down costs. “If 1,000 people in a group can keep sending messages to everyone else, that cost quickly becomes unmanageable,” said Gaurav Mishra, CEO of 2020 Social, a social-networking media consultancy based in New Delhi.
SMSGupShup is often compared to Twitter, especially in US media, but the comparison is problematic because SMSGupShup is essentially a group SMS service. It doesn’t have a searchable public timeline, a robust API and application ecosystem, or the highly engaged user behavior we see on Twitter that is driven by public one-to-one conversations.
Most importantly, the default user behavior on Twitter is to “create” a status update, but the default user behavior on SMSGupShup is to “consume” updates created by others. I’ll not be surprised if less than 5% of SMSGupShup’s 26 million users have ever created an update, or created a profile.
SMSGupShup is hesitant to change the user behavior from “consume” to “create” because sending text messages on behalf of users costs serious money. So, it has limited the number of messages group creators can send daily and restricted many-to-many messaging to small groups. It’s focusing on creating new revenue streams by creating custom channels for brands, opening up its API to application developers and creating an online marketplace for subscription plans, premium groups, and merchandise.
However, SMSGupShup will find it difficult to become an attractive platform for brands to engage with consumers, unless the default user behavior on the platform changes from “consume” to “create”. Brands use Twitter for market research, lead generation, viral marketing and customer support: use cases that are made possible by users talking to each other and to the brands themselves.
Given the compulsion to control outgoing SMS costs, it won’t be an easy change. Perhaps, the solution is to segment the users into those who have access to the mobile web and those don’t. For users with web access, SMSGupShup can become a “social platform” driven by compulsively updated status messages. For users without web access, SMSGupShup can remain an “alerts platform” where they subscribe to groups and receive SMS updates. The two sets of users will have an overlap, though, and the success of this web-SMS hybrid model will depend on how SMSGupShup manages this overlap.
Cross-posted at 2020 Social: Because Business is Social.









Hats off to Ogilvy & Mather for this brilliant marketing strategy. It could not get better than this in terms of response.
What I really find truly more amazing is that it has had such an enormous online buzz considering that it was the TV commercials that initiated this response. If it was not for web 2.0 platforms, how would consumers like us react and discuss and engage the new Zoozoo phenom. Perhaps in conversation
over drinks though now its in your face every where you go, in a very positive light.
Sunsilk Gang Of Girls had a similar response. I’m not sure what the numbers say, though I know it was a very successful campaign with their blog.
While Social Media Marketing is definitely the new way of advertising I believe it would be sometime atleast in India, where traditional Newspapers and Television would be the primary outreach and would be complimented by these
platforms.
Why does it have to be a blend? Couple of reasons that come up straight are the low Internet speeds in India.
It is almost impossible to watch a full video on youtube without having it buffer.I have broadband connection, a few people are still using dated dialup connections.
The older Gen still do not visit most networking sites such as Facebook, twitter youtube or orkut.
This is another reason why the Zoozoo campaign was so successful. It had thought of its target market, used exactly the right platforms, listened to the conversations and really pulled the crowds into engaging with the brand.
Interactive campaigns such as the Axe alarm and Sachin’s call an IVR number did not really participate much online.
If you look at the online trends for the term Vodafone using Google Insights you will find it absolutely phenemonal to how the brand awareness increased during the IPL period. Perhaps not everyone went out and bought new connections, though it certainly did build the awareness.